Friday, December 31, 2010

Week in Headlines


Media
Journalism Groups Protest Texas A&M’s Open-Records Proposal

Texas A&M News
Texas A&M Revisits Open-Records Ruling After Outcry

Texas News
Federal Audit Slams Spending for Hurricane Ike Cleanup

Texas Politics
New Congress May Affect Federal Funds for Texas

National News
Regulation and Disclosure of Fracking at the Center of Gas Drilling Debate

National Politics
New House Members Wake Up to Redistricting

Foreign Policy
Security in Afghanistan Worsens

War & Peace
US Drone Attack Kills Eight in Pakistan

Domestic Policy
Government Pay Freeze Expands to More Civil Servants

Economics
Corporations Using Cash Supplies to Fuel Mergers Not Job Growth

Poverty
Plight of the High School Homeless

Education
State Schools Rethink Fees

Health Care
Unemployment May Lead to Less Healthy Diets

Environment
Court Rules Against Texas on Greenhouse Gases

Climate Change
Is the End in Sight for The World’s Coral Reefs?

Science & Technology
US Science Funding Faces Uncertain Future

Immigration
More States Seeking to Follow Arizona's Push for Tougher Immigration Rules

Civil Rights
Individuals May Be Placed on No-Fly Database After Tip From One Source

Human Rights
Reports of Human Rights Abuses and Detentions in Pakistan

Reproductive Rights
Challenges of Roe More Frequent Since Late-Term Abortion Ban Upheld

Women’s & Gender Issues
Smoking Tied to Miscarriage Risk

GLBT Issues
Bigger Test Ahead After Don't Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal

Race & Racism
Texas Textbook Standards Challenged by NAACP and LULAC

From the Blogs
Life on the Brazos:
Chutzpah

Texas Liberal:
Let’s End The Year By Asking Oursleves The Big Questions

Conscience of a Liberal:
Unemployment Claims and Employment Growth

Local News: Wellborn Groups Say They Have Signatures to Force Recall Votes

Wellborn Groups Say They Have Signatures to Force Recall Votes
By Cassie Smith

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

The groups trying to thwart the possible annexation of Wellborn said Thursday they have obtained enough voters' signatures to force recall elections for two members of the College Station City Council.

The announcement by Citizens for Wellborn and SaveWellborn.com came as a group of College Station residents mobilized to counter the recall campaign.

The anti-annexation groups, which have targeted Mayor Nancy Berry and four council members for recall, have already collected the signatures necessary to stage recall elections of council members Katy-Marie Lyles and Dave Ruesink, according to Jane W. Cohen of Citizens for Wellborn.

They have until Jan. 10 to obtain voter signatures for all the council members. The number of signatures must equal at least 40 percent of the vote cast in the last regular municipal election for each elected official's seat.

Also targeted for recall are Councilmen John Crompton and Dennis Maloney. Crompton can't run again due to term limitations, and Maloney has said he will not seek re-election. Lyles, Ruesink and Berry each have at least a year left on their respective terms.

Jess Fields is the only council member unaffected by either the recall effort or next May's general election.

To remove Crompton, the groups need 2,169 voters' signatures; an election to recall Maloney would require 2,164; one for Lyles would take 1,210; one for Ruesink, 1,160; and one for Berry, 1,553.

Meanwhile, a group of College Station residents opposing the recall efforts has emerged to correct what they say is misinformation about the campaign. The group will run an ad in The Eagle next week outlining its position.

"It's irresponsible if the ultimate were to happen in College Station with the recall election," said Steve Arden of Brazosland Classic Realty, who's lived in the Bryan-College Station area for about 35 years.

Arden, however, believes voters will "soundly defeat" any recall efforts put up for a vote.

The group says the recall campaign will not allow Wellborn residents to vote on incorporation, nor will it preclude the possible future annexation of Wellborn. A successful recall, the group argues, would only disrupt the council's normal business for two to three months, delay installation of new traffic signals, delay the city's purchase of anything costing more than $50,000 and prevent the city from dealing with emergencies.

The group's ad includes instructions on how voters can "unsign" the petition.

City officials have said that if the anti-annexation groups gather the signatures required to place all or any of the five elected officials up for recall, May's election would be both a regular election and a recall election.

The recall petitions seek to remove the council members to prevent a quorum from voting on the possible annexation of 681 acres in the Wellborn area. Wellborn residents have been fighting for a year to avoid annexation by the city but failed to get the council to authorize a vote on allowing residents to incorporate their own municipality. Because Wellborn is within College Station's extraterritorial jurisdiction -- an area outside the city limits but under some city control -- city leaders must approve any move for Wellborn to incorporate as a city.

Crompton, meanwhile, issued a statement saying he's concerned that the recall campaign will diminish the quality of the city's governance.

"Unfortunately, the recall petitions are having a profoundly negative impact on the city's high caliber of governance and service," he said, noting that the city has never held a recall election in its history. "The damage obviously will be accentuated if the petitions are successful, and the situation will deteriorate further if council members are actually recalled in an election."

The recall effort fosters an atmosphere of incivility and may deter "honorable and knowledgeable residents" from running for elected office, Crompton said. It also is reducing the pool of senior managers who can be persuaded to take executive positions with the city and encouraging the city's current senior managers to look for opportunities elsewhere.

"College Station's remarkable record of effective city service delivery in recent years is a reflection of the excellence of its staff, especially its senior management team," he said.

But Cohen said that the anti-annexation campaign is the "straw that broke the camel's back."

"The citizens of College Station are tired of their council not listening to them, of getting misinformation and half-information," she said.

Cohen said the city has failed to comply with her open records request regarding Wellborn. She said it took the city six months to fully comply with a July 2 request for information that under state law should have been available in 10 days.

Cohen said that, not only did the request take too long, it was incomplete and didn't include all the information she asked for.

"This means that the city of College Station did not accurately comply with the public information request," she said. "This makes me wonder what other e-mails, notes and memos were not provided."

Acting City Attorney Carla Robinson said the city handled Cohen's open records request the same as any other request it receives. Robinson said there was much back-and-forth communication between the city and Cohen that delayed the process, but the city acted completely within the law.

Robinson said Cohen had asked for a "voluminous" amount of information, and a few pieces were left out of the original request. However, she said, once that was identified the information was provided to Cohen.

Cohen has filed a complaint with the Texas Attorney General's Office.

Published on Friday, December 31, 2010

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Paul Krugman On An Economy Under Siege

Local News: College Station City Council to Decide Between Finalists for City Manager

8 Finalists for CS City Manager
Posted by Bill Oliver

From WTAW 1620AM

The College Station City Council has eight candidates for its next City Manager.

Mayor Nancy Berry says 50 applications were reviewed by her and councilmen Dennis Maloney and Jess Fields.

The mayor plans on a council review of the final eight at its next meeting in two weeks.

Berry says some are from Brazos County, two are from out of state but with experiences in Texas. She adds some are women and not all are white.

Listen to the WTAW interview with Mayor Nancy Berry.

Published on Thursday, December 30, 2010

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Tonight on Biased Transmission


This week on Biased Transmission Tonight a special call-in, 2010 year-in-review. Call in with your opinion on the 2010 mid-term election, Julian Assange, the Pakistani flood, and the Tea Party. Want to talk about A&M and the collapse of higher education in the state of Texas? You want to talk to us about the approaching apocalypse and your refugee camp plans? Call tonight 979-779-5367 (979-779-KEOS).

Listen to Biased Transmission every Wednesday from 6-7pm on the Brazos Valley’s only community radio station, 89.1FM KEOS. Tune in to hear Teddy, Michael, Danny, and Sam discuss the issues and interview guest. Every week Biased Transmission discusses dangerous ideas for dangerous times.

Biased Transmission on Facebook

Biased Transmission on LiveStream

Biased Transmission Online Archive of Shows

Local News: Bryan and College Station Authorities Enforcing K2 Ban

B-CS Ban on K2 Enforced
By Maggie Kiely

From the Bryan-College Station

As politicians and law enforcement across the state and nation continue to push for bans on K2, local authorities are working to enforce city ordinances that made the substance illegal in Bryan and College Station.

Since this summer, when both cities passed ordinances that outlawed selling, possessing and producing K2 --a substance said to have the same effects of marijuana-- two citations have been written for possession in Bryan and seven in College Station. The crime is a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $500.

Because the ban was passed by the municipalities and not countywide, the Brazos County Sheriff's Office has not issued any citations for K2 possession.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency is in the process of finalizing an emergency ban on five substances commonly found in K2 products, according to the DEA website.

The ban will make it illegal to sell or possess any of the chemicals outlawed and designates K2 as a Schedule I substance --the same as heroin or cocaine.

Locally, authorities say, a nationwide ban won't really change the way local law enforcement deals with the substance.

"We're aware of some anticipated changes, but it doesn't really affect us on a local level because we have the city ordinance," said Jon Agnew, spokesman for the Bryan Police Department.

Law enforcement officials in Brazos County, as well as in Bryan and College Station, expect the Texas Legislatures to pass a statewide ban on K2 during the 2011 legislative session.

But, until Texas legislators outlaw K2 on a state level, Agnew said, possessing K2 will remain a Class C misdemeanor under the city ordinance.

If a state ban is passed, lawmakers will have to decide what sort of charges K2 offenders will face.

Judge Ed Spillane, who resides over the College Station Municipal Court, said he hasn't seen any K2 cases in his court.

Once lawmakers pass a statewide ban, he said, there will still be issues that need to be clarified.

"Courts will be looking at level of evidence, do you need a testing lab, things like that," he said. "Because it hasn't gone through the courts, a lot of things haven't been sorted out yet."

Published on Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Gladwell on Income Inequality: We're Off the Rails

Local News: Bryan and College Station Continue Searches for City Managers

CS Has Short List of City Manager Candidates; Bryan in No Rush
Reporter: Steve Fullhart

From KBTX Channel 3

One of the Twin Cities is currently without a permanent city manager. The other will need one in about a month. The cities are in very different mindsets when it comes to their respective, somewhat similar situations.

College Station's elected leaders have a short list to work with when it comes to finding the next top staff member. Mayor Nancy Berry says the council will start looking at a list of between five and ten candidates at its next executive session. That's after a sub-committee of three councilmembers -- Berry, Jess Fields and Dennis Maloney -- whittled down more than 50 applicants for the job.

Berry says that short list consists of both local and out-of-town applicants. Most have high-level city government experience on their resumes.

Phone and face-to-face interviews with the finalists would come after the council meets and continues to shorten its list.

The city has chosen not to use a consultant with this search. Their process to find the next city manager -- posting the job listing and conducting the search from city hall -- is similar to the one that brought City Secretary Sherry Mashburn earlier this year.

The last day of the retiring city manager, Glenn Brown, is January 31, though Berry says Brown has agreed to stay on a bit longer if necessary. Berry says an ideal situation would see Brown's replacement at least named by the end of January.

However, the on-going recall efforts of five councilmembers could alter that time line. Berry says if some or all of the recalls are successful, the city will contact the finalists and let them know about the tumultuous situation so they can consider whether they want to continue with the interview process.

Supporters of Wellborn residents who are seeking to incorporate are attempting to recall the five officials who voted in favor of beginning a process to study whether the Wellborn community should be annexed.

Some semblance of a search to replace Brown would have begun earlier according to Berry, but with the death this summer of Councilmember Larry Stewart, city leaders decided to wait until Stewart's replacement was determined in the November special election so a full council could make a decision.

In Bryan, they're currently without a permanent city manager after David Watkins' resignation in September, but Mayor Jason Bienski says there aren't plans to start a search any time soon.

City leaders are happy with the work of the interim, Kean Register, and Bienski says Register is willing to stay on as the interim for a while if necessary.

Bienski also praised Deputy City Managers Hugh Walker and Joey Dunn along with Register, who is serving as the interim city manager for the second time. The BTU group manager held the title before Watkins' hiring in 2006.

Published on Monday, December 27, 2010

Monday, December 27, 2010

The Role of Government and the Racial Legacy of the New Deal

Over the last century American attitudes have changed about a whole host of issues, as social and cultural changes have changed the political landscape. As Americans struggle with the effects of the Great Recession, historians and political scientist have looked back at American attitudes during the Great Depression. The Pew Research Center recently released a report on the differences in attitudes between Americans dealing with trying economic times in the 1930’s and Americans deal with trying economic times now. The differences are quite profound.

What the report shows is that the public during Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency where much more likely to support more government programs than the public is now during Barack Obama’s presidency. Even though unemployment was about twice as high as it is currently, the public during the Great Depression was much less likely to blame the “Groton-Harvard-educated president -- this despite his failure, over his first term in office, to bring a swift end to their hardship.” During the 1930’s Americans were also much more optimistic about the future economic outlook of American and their own personal finances.

American’s views on the role of government have also changed dramatically since the implementation of the reforms and programs of the New Deal. While it is difficult to compare exact poll questions you can compare questions about similar subjects. During the 1930’s 76% of those surveyed by Gallup supported the government providing free medical care for the poor, while according to a recent Gallup poll only 42% of Americans support the government ensuring access the health care. While 88% of those surveyed in the 1930’s supported the government regulating against misleading food or drug advertising, just 51% of Americans today think that the federal government should protect consumers from unsafe products.

It seems strange that after the successful implementation of New Deal programs that help build the American middle class in the 1950’s, that the public would be less likely to support the type of government programs that worked in the past. It seems stranger still that Americans would support those programs less after thirty years of movement conservatives attempting to dismantle the legacy of FDR, and in tern through those policies tearing down the middle class and creating the greatest wealth divide since before the Great Depression. The so-called Reagan revolution was successful at causing middle and working class Americans to vote against their better economic interests, and they continue to do so today. But FDR had detractors during his presidency, so why did Americans support those programs then and not now?

In the Pew Research Center report it notes that “in its early years of polling, Gallup asked few questions directly comparable with today's more standardized sets. Moreover, its samples were heavily male, relatively well off and overwhelmingly white.” This is important to note because the vast majority of Americans who benefited from the New Deal programs were white. As Abigail Sewell notes at Racism Review, “FDR’s New Deal funded the seeds of post-World War II suburbanization and with it, white flight, through the National Housing Act of 1934 implemented by the Federal Housing Administration. These government handouts are in part responsible for the crystallization of a large black-white gap in wealth we still see today.”

Americans were happy with government programs that helped middle and working class people as long as they were the white middle and working class. This is after all only a few years removed from the greatest revival of the Klu Klux Klan since the Civil War, and during a time of racial subjugation in the south under Jim Crow. The single biggest social change in America since the New Deal was the ending of Jim Crow, the passing of the Civil Rights Acts, and the many reforms to fight discrimination. It is this history that must be taken into account when a governor of California begins his presidential campaign in the south with a speech about states rights, and who coins the phrase “welfare queen” that has become a code word in white America for people of color who benefit from government programs for the poor.

It isn’t that Americans’ attitudes about what the proper role of government is have changed so much since the 1930’s, it’s that the people who have benefited from government programs has changed.

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - December 27, 2010


The Texas Progressive Alliance hopes Santa Claus was good to you as it delivers the last blog roundup for 2010.

Bay Area Houston notices that Death Panels are starting in Jan.

Off the Kuff took a look at the election contest that was filed in HD48.

Harold at Letters From Texas told a little Christmas story from his childhood, to (unsuccessfully) prove that he's not a scrooge.

It seems the EPA and Big Gas agree on something: Hydraulic fracturing causes gas to penetrate into the water zone! TXsharon caught Big Gas shooting themselves in the foot and exposed it on Bluedaze: DRILLING REFORM FOR TEXAS.

If you want a lighter take on Texas's 4 new Congressional seats announced by the Census this week that includes calls for reform on how we do redistricting in Texas and Lord of the Rings references, head over to TexasVox.

WhosPlayin has mostly been quiet over the holiday, but is following how one gas driller, Titan Operating has legal battles going on in two adjacent cities: Flower Mound, and Lewisville.

Local News: Aggie Shares Story of Discharge Under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Discharged Aggie Tells His Story
By Vimal Patel

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

Three little words threw Aggie Danny Hernandez's life into a whirl: Are you gay?

In fall 2009, as Hernandez served as a reservist in the Marine Corps while finishing his last semester at Texas A&M, the startling inquiry came from his first sergeant in Waco when the superior got word Hernandez had told others about his sexuality.

He felt all he had worked toward slipping away. He considered lying but saw a stack of papers on the sergeant's desk, the top two appearing to be handwritten witness statements.

Hernandez answered truthfully.

Raised in Paradise, Texas, Hernandez wanted to be a Marine since he was age 14. So he enrolled at one of the nation's most military friendly schools, Texas A&M, because of its Corps of Cadets.

There, he dove into Aggiedom, serving as a Fish Camp counselor and in the Corps of Cadets. He also was in the famous Aggie Band and elite Ross Volunteer Company, the Texas governor's honor guard.

While a student, the communications and sociology double major worked in the marketing and communications department and was even an Aggieland Visitor Center tour guide, walking would-be Aggies across campus and scooting VIPs in a golf cart.

"I fell in love with the school," he said.

'I Was Scared'

He confided in cadets at Texas A&M that he was gay, and in all his time in the Corps, an issue never arose. During his junior year, he enlisted as a reservist in the Marines.

In fall 2009, he confided in two men in his reserve unit that he was gay. One told another, Hernandez said, and word spread and reached the first sergeant, and eventually commanding officer.

"I was scared," Hernandez said. "I didn't know how to answer, and I said 'yes.' He told me he knew what I had told those two other Marines, and that he had asked them to write statements on everything I had talked to them about, and they complied. They used that as credible evidence that I had in fact told somebody."

His commanding officer, Hernandez said, informed him that he would be discharged from the military.

Weeks away from graduation, he thought his career in the military was set, so he hadn't been applying for any jobs, and now, he had nowhere to go after A&M. Also, he said, his contract had stated that the Marines would pick up his student loans, so he didn't bother applying for scholarships, but now was stuck with some $15,000 in loans.

"Everything I was planning was basically crumbling during this short period of time," Hernandez said.

And he felt alone. Though he had confided in close friends that he was gay, he was far from open. He was raised a devout Catholic and was worried family members wouldn't take it well, so he didn't tell them.

After graduation, he headed to Washington, landing work at a non-profit and eventually joining the staff of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a non-profit founded to advocate for the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. He's working there now as a development assistant.

'...be faithful to me'

On April 28, nine weeks after he was discharged, Hernandez wrote a letter -- reluctantly -- that was posted on the SLDN website to President Barack Obama, who had promised as a candidate to end the policy.

He wrote of his willingness to still die for the country that wouldn't allow him to serve, of his shattered dream of being an officer, of the Marine Corps motto Semper fidelis, meaning always faithful.

"I have remained faithful to my country," he concluded. "Please be faithful to me."

He was scared again after the posting.

He still hadn't told his family, but the defense network website had 150,000 hits that day, and the letter -- part of a project titled "Stories From The Front Lines: Letters to President Barack Obama" -- was carried by several media outlets.

He called home that night. His family -- he was raised by his aunt and uncle -- took the news exceptionally well and have been supportive since, he said.

"My family's biggest disappointment they voiced was they wished I was upfront with them so they could have at least been there with me as I was going through it," Hernandez said.

This month, he was in the Senate gallery as the Senate voted 65 to 31 to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell, clearing the last hurdle to repeal the policy born 17 years ago when newly-elected President Bill Clinton was caught between a campaign promise to allow gays to serve in the military and an unexpected level of opposition to the idea.

"I was sitting with SLDN board members and veterans affected by the policy. I've been involved with this movement for a few months. A lot of the people I was with were involved for 17 years," Hernandez said. "It was incredibly momentous and just very emotional."

Last week, he met Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, an advocate of repeal (the last year connected him with another powerful woman, pop star Lady Gaga, who he met in D.C. and allowed him to speak before her at a September repeal rally in Maine).

"I feel like I've grown up more this past year than I have throughout the rest of my life, and I think that's all positive," Hernandez said. "But at the same time, it is an injustice. Something that I was struggling with, something that was such a small part of my life at that point, was the reason that I lost so much of what I had worked for."

He's at a crossroads, now. Plan A is to go back into the service once a pending legal matter related to his discharge is resolved, and the policy -- which remains in effect -- ends. And Plan B is law school. He took the LSAT last month and doesn't know yet how he did.

The 23-year-old's journey is one of some 14,000 stories of discharges under the policy, according to SLDN.

"People think gay, and they think effiminate, or they think not manly, or they think crazy, radical, liberal activist, and I wouldn't really consider myself any of those things," Hernandez said. "I'm a Texan, and I'm an Aggie, and I'm just like everyone else, aside from that one aspect of my life -- that I'm gay."

Published on Sunday, December 26, 2010

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Tonight on Biased Transmission


This week on Biased Transmission our studio guest is Chad Petty, a local musician who plays at such venues as the Revolution Café and Bar. Our topics of Conversation will include the inspiration behind his music, and his experiences as a musician.

Listen to Biased Transmission every Wednesday on 89.1FM KEOS College Station-Bryan from 6-7pm, to hear Teddy Wilson, Michael Alvard, Danny Yeager, and Ann Preston. If you have a question or comment you can post it here, or call the KEOS Bell Studios: 979-779-5367.

Biased Transmission on Facebook

Biased Transmission on LiveStream

Biased Transmission Online Archive of Shows

Local News: College Station Could Profit From Annexation of Wellborn

CS May Profit by Annexing Wellborn
By Matthew Watkins

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

College Station could benefit financially by annexing land in the community of Wellborn, according to a preliminary city analysis.

The report, presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission last week, estimated that College Station would receive $297,000 each year in new revenue from sales tax, property tax and utility payments. The cost of extending services to the new citizens would be about $157,000 a year -- leading to a $140,000 profit.

But city staff acknowledged that the estimate is incomplete and annexation could be more costly than the report indicates. For instance, the city would likely have to extend sewer service to the residents, which would require expenditures that aren't accounted for in the initial report.

City officials said the report is just one factor that will be considered in the long process of deciding whether or not to annex. That process has grown increasingly controversial in recent months and has led to a campaign by annexation opponents to recall five members of the city council.

"I need to see the entire service plan and what it is going to take and what the economic impact will be," said Mayor Nancy Berry. "Only until we have gone through the public process of public hearings am I going to make a decision as to whether I would vote for the city to move forward to annexation."

The document was provided to The Eagle the same day that Brazos County Commissioners Court declined for the second straight week to take an official stand in the debate over Wellborn's future.

The court considered passing a resolution asking College Station to look more closely at annexation's impact on Wellborn residents, but voted 3-1 to take the it off the agenda after concerns were raised about its wording.

Most commissioners have said they oppose annexation. County Judge Randy Sims urged meeting attendees to call and encourage local State Rep. Fred Brown to "stay the course" in his effort to fight annexation in the Texas Legislature. Commissioners Lloyd Wasserman and Irma Cauley have also spoken out against it.

Commissioner Duane Peters, who will be sworn in as county judge next month, said he wished the court would stay out of the fight.

"It is part of the city's right to do that and it is really not the county's business to get into," he said.

A county lawyer agreed, telling the court that the county had no role in the annexation process.

But the other commissioners stated their intention to reconsider the issue again at an upcoming meeting. Their concerns echoed those of the four residents who spoke at the meeting -- that College Station wasn't considering annexation's impact on the residents of Wellborn.

"There was no assessment of any factor independent of the city of College Station," said Greg Taylor, who opposes annexation. "There was no direct impact assessed on the residents of the annex area and especially those of us in the [extraterritorial jurisdiction]."

Residents said they were especially concerned about fire protection, which is currently provided by the South Brazos County Volunteer Fire Department.

The department has a station in the proposed annexation area. That building would likely be purchased by the city if it completed the process.

"I know our fire department can do a better job because these are people we care about," said Emily Staples, chief of the volunteer department. "When we respond to calls, we are not paid for it. We go because we are part of that community and they support us and they mean a lot to us."

The process to consider annexing Wellborn began in November and moved forward with a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission last week. The council will consider an ordinance in January that would set the dates for meetings at which a service plan for the targeted area would be presented.

Once that plan is complete, more detailed projections on the impact will be available. The land being considered is 681 acres bound by the city limits on the east side, Capstone Drive on the north, I&GN Road on the west and Koppe Bridge Road and Greens Prairie Road on the south.

The preliminary impact report estimates that about 212 people live in 84 houses in the area. It projects that population to grow by about 170 people in the coming years.

Published on Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Monday, December 20, 2010

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - December 20, 2010


The Texas Progressive Alliance is tracking reports of sugar plum sightings as it brings you this week's blog roundup.

Off the Kuff reminds you that expanded gambling is still doomed in the next Legislative session.

The EPA Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Order to Protect Drinking Water in Southern Parker County has spawned a media frenzy but news sources only tell part of the story. TXsharon has a short timeline of events surrounding the water contamination that should change the conversation.

Led by the so-called "professional left", Texas Democrats locked Aaron Pena in the virtual town square stocks and hurled rotten tomatoes at him until he cried. "Call Out Aaron" Day was the social media hit of the holiday season, by all accounts (except Pena's). See PDiddie and Brains and Eggs for details.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme wants to know how deluded you have to be to pick Dick Armey as Texan of the Year.

Neil at Texas Liberal ran the Dan Patrick family Christmas sugar cookie recipe that Mr. Patrick posted on Facebook. In addition, far-right Senator Patrick announced an update on the Tea Party caucus in the Texas Legislature. After you eat enough of the Patrick cookies loaded with butter and sugar, you can go and die because the Tea Party Caucus made sure you had no health insurance.

Mean Rachel got really pissed off at Aaron Pena.

TexasVox went absolutely crazy covering the Sunset hearings on the TCEQ and Railroad Commission this last week, and if you missed it, you can get caught up here.

Local News: Wellborn Annexation Not a Forgone Conclusion

Berry Says Wellborn Annexation Not a Done Deal
By Cassie Smith

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

Why annex Wellborn? Why now?

College Station Mayor Nancy Berry suggests the city has no choice but to explore that option.

"The Citizens for Wellborn have forced the issue," Berry said, referring to an anti-annexation group. "Do I think that at some point we would have started the annexation process? Sure. Would it have happened now? I don't know."

But Berry maintains she hasn't made up her mind on how she'll vote when the proposed annexation of about 700 acres south of the city finally comes before the City Council.

If the plan to provide necessary city services to the newly annexed area costs $8 million a year and it takes College Station 15 years to recoup its costs "then it's not worth it," the mayor said.

"That's why the process has started. It's not because we want to annex Wellborn," Berry said. "We want to find out what it's going to cost to annex Wellborn. What are the benefits? Then, once we have that information, we can make a decision."

The process continued last week when the city's Planning and Zoning Commission, during a meeting that ended after midnight and included comments from Wellborn residents opposed to the move, recommended the city move forward with the annexation.

The commission determined that the annexation would indeed benefit the city while protecting Wellborn's rural character through zoning and other controls.

The next step will be taken in January, when the council will consider an ordinance setting the dates for two future meetings at which a service plan for the targeted area would be presented.

The 681 acres being eyed by College Station are generally bounded by the city limits on the east side, Capstone Drive on the north, I&GN Road on the West, and Koppe Bridge Road and Greens Prairie Road on the south.

CS Services

The city must provide services to that annexed area that are comparable to those offered to city residents.

Upon annexation, the city would have to immediately offer fire and police protection, sanitation and any day-to-day services, according to Lance Simms, assistant director of planning and development services for College Station.

State law allows a delay in providing some services, such as infrastructure improvements, as long as the city provides a detailed schedule and funding options, Simms said.

"Obviously you can't expect to have a sewer line in the ground the next day," he said.

The city would not have to provide water, which would continue to be provided by Wellborn, or electricity, which is provided by Bryan Texas Utilities.

Opposition Active

While city staff proceeds with researching the effects of annexation, two groups are working to short-circuit the process.

The Citizens for Wellborn and SaveWellborn.org submitted affidavits to the city to begin the process of recalling Berry and council members John Crompton, Dennis Maloney, Katy-Marie Lyles and Dave Ruesink.

Timothy Delasandro, with SaveWellborn.org, said the organization has set up a permanent office in the Park Place Plaza across from Aggieland Credit Union to collect signatures. Additionally, members will man booths that will be moved around the city.

"We're certainly on pace to have enough signatures to recall the mayor," he said. "The goal is not to shut the city down. The goal is to make the city listen to its own citizens."

The groups have less than 30 days to collect signatures. For each targeted council member, the petitioners have to acquire voter signatures totaling at least 40 percent of the votes cast in the last regular municipal election for the seat.

Wellborn residents have been fighting for a year to avoid annexation by the city but failed to get the council to authorize a vote on allowing residents to incorporate their own municipality. Because Wellborn is within College Station's extraterritorial jurisdiction -- an area outside the city limits but under some city control -- city leaders must approve any move for Wellborn to incorporate as a city.

The anti-annexation groups say they will drop the recall petitions if the city agrees to a two-year moratorium on any annexation vote, which would allow new members to be elected to the council and an annexation bill by state Rep. Fred Brown to be considered by the Legislature.

Berry has rejected that offer.

City officials have said the recall election won't have to be held until the general election in May, but Delasandro disagrees and says a March election is required by the city charter.

Meanwhile, Citizens for Wellborn has launched a "Find Five" campaign, in which each petition-signer is asked to line up another five voters.

So far, the group has obtained signatures from a range of voters, including college students, professors, longtime residents, business owners and others, said one of the organizers, Karen Severn.

Councilwoman Jana McMillan -- one of two elected officials not targeted for recall by the anti-annexation forces -- said her short tenure on council has been a "real eye opener" and that the council is not making choices in the best interest of the city.

"In the case of the Wellborn annexation I see no other remedy available. That is why I support and have signed three of the recall petitions," she said.

McMillan, elected in November to fill an unexpired term through the May election, said she did not support the move to remove Crompton and Maloney because the two council members' terms are up in May.

Annexation Timeline:

November: City Council gives direction to initiate annexation planning process.

December: Planning and Zoning Commission makes its recommendation for annexation.

January: Ordinance establishing public hearing dates.

January/Feburary: Prepare annexation service plan.

February: Send public hearing notices.

March: City Council holds two public hearings.

April: City Council votes on adopting annexation ordinance.

Published on Sunday, December 19, 2010

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Local News: BTU to Release Salaries of Top Managers

BTU May Release Top Salaries
By Matthew Watkins

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

BTU General Manager Dan Wilkerson confirmed Monday that he'll recommend the release of his top 14 managers' salary figures -- a development he's spent months fighting.

Wilkerson said the disclosure will increase transparency at the city-owned utility company, which has stringently protected its budget information in the past. He previously said the release would leave the company vulnerable to competitors. The Bryan City Council will consider the proposal at its Tuesday meeting.

A former top city official repeatedly asked for that information, along with other BTU budget details, starting earlier this year. The Eagle filed multiple open records requests for similar information.

"There seems to be in the community a few who think that some salaries at BTU and some information about our operations should be released so that those who pay for our electric services would know more about how we operate," Wilkerson said. "We are trying to do that while protecting those things that are important to our business."

Bryan Texas Utilities is a government agency, but many of its budget details have been allowed to be kept private after the Texas Legislature voted in 1999 to deregulate the electricity market and allow private companies to compete with municipally owned utilities. The Legislature gave cities the option to keep their utilities' financial information secret to keep potential competitors from learning trade secrets or undercutting them.

That competition never came and, almost 12 years later, BTU still has a monopoly in its service area.

Calls to release those numbers came to the forefront this spring when BTU leadership told the City Council that it was considering a rate increase of between 5 and 20 percent. The city manager at the time, David Watkins, began complaining that BTU's finances needed more scrutiny and that the organization wasn't providing him with the detailed budget information that he requested.

Watkins eventually resigned amid the controversy, and the council ordered an audit of BTU. No details of the audit have been released, but the council will discuss it during a workshop Tuesday afternoon.

At the height of the dispute with Watkins, local state lawmakers told The Eagle that they would work to repeal the 1999 law in the upcoming legislative session.

State Sen. Steve Ogden, a Republican from Bryan, repeated that intention in an interview last week, saying he saw no credence to the argument that BTU's budget information should be withheld from the public.

"I promise we are going to address that," Ogden said.

He said that other utilities have used the law to "basically rape, plunder and pillage their ratepayers."

"I have talked to BTU and am not convinced that any of that information would adversely affect BTU customers if it was public," he said.

"I think their request is, 'Well, we understand if you feel like we need to change, but just don't make it look like you are picking on one agency.' That is OK with me because this issue is bigger than BTU."

Wilkerson said Monday that his decision to support more transparency wasn't in response to any potential law changes.

Rather, Bryan Mayor Jason Bienski requested the information in October, and this is an effort to comply, Wilkerson said.

He said BTU has spent the past few months consulting with lawyers, industry experts and staff to determine what could be released and what should remain protected. If the council approves his proposals, they'll give out the total compensation for their 14 managers, he said, but not information on more specialized positions, like employees who focus on trading energy off the Electric Reliability Council of Texas market and certified transmission operators.

"I think we still have the same concerns that releasing some salaries may lead to people being poached from us, but at the same time, we are trying to balance the public's right to know with that risk we are taking," Wilkerson said.

Bienski, the Bryan mayor, said he's pleased with the middle ground BTU has offered and hopes it will quell some of the controversy.

"There has been a lot of rumors spread by folks in the past year about certain managers making a million dollars a year, and this will hopefully dispel some of that false information," Bienski said. "BTU has one of the lowest rates in the state of Texas and we want to make sure we are competitive and we don't do anything to harm that reputation. We are hoping this will be a fair representation of what the public has been asking for without jeopardizing the business structure."

The disclosure will be considered as part of a proposed resolution submitted by Wilkerson that would also require BTU to submit to the City Council an annual performance report and a list of all people who submitted an open records request to the agency in the past year.

Published on Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Monday, December 13, 2010

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - December 13, 2010


The Texas Progressive Alliance is stocking up on figgy pudding as it brings you this week's blog roundup.

Off the Kuff covered a shoddy attempt by new Harris County Tax Assessor Don Sumners to disallow voter registration efforts at naturalization ceremonies.

Letters From Texas projected out the grim possibilities for state representative Aaron Peña as he contemplates switching to the Republican Party.

Now is the time to ask Larry Summers to do something REALLY useful. You know, for the good of the country.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme thinks Barack Obama is a putz and Bernie Sanders is a hero. UT professor Galbraith says it all.

Edmundo Rocha's pays tribute to the passing of civil rights activist and former San Antonio Express-News columnist Carlos Guerra. An unsung hero who never gave up hope for a better Texas.

Aaron Pena's impending party flip is tied directly to his 2012 Congressional ambitions. PDiddie at Brains and Eggs explains.

Bay Area Houston dog piles on State Representative Aaron Pena. He could get with this. Or he could get with that.

lightseeker at TexasKaos reports on Rick Perry's latest foray into half-truths and self-serving opportunism. This time he is whipping up a big batch of whacked out claims about the cost of providing health care to uninsured Texans. Check out the details here: Rick Perry , Rabble Rouser .

Public Citizen Texas over at TexasVox wants to remind everyone to show up to testify at the Sunset Advsory Commission meeting Dec 15th on the Railroad Commission and TCEQ. Details are at their blog.

Neil at Texas Liberal ran a post with pictures he took last spring at the Houston Ship Channel. Neil's view is that if the world around us is at times not ideal, there are still many things to consider, learn about, and maybe even embrace. This does not mean we should be resigned to a polluted landscape. Neil has been stressing of late in his blog the need for action by average people in the face of the newly empowered Republican party in Austin and Washington. We know from the TPA posts listed here this week that things are a mess. The question is what are we going to do in reply to this mess?

Monday, December 6, 2010

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - December 6, 2010


The Texas Progressive Alliance is gathering up boughs of holly in anticipation of future hall-decking as it brings you this week's blog roundup.

Off the Kuff takes a look at the HHSC report on the effects of dropping Medicaid. Short answer: It would be bad, but what they really have in mind to do may be even worse.

Bay Area Houston has some interesting comments on the criminal probe of State Representative Joe Driver.

Capitol Annex takes a look at a dangerous proposal by incoming State Rep. Dan Huberty (R-Humble) to allow independent school districts to lessen the amount of cash reserves they are required to keep on hand and explains why this is a terrible idea.

This week on Left of College Station, Teddy takes a look at the shortfall in the Texas budget. Left of College Station also covers the week in headlines.

This week, McBlogger reminds everyone to STOP SHOUTING at the Federal Reserve for doing it's job.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme won't be switching to Uverse now that AT&T bought 700 copies of Rick Perry's book. Yuck.

Neil at Texas Liberal makes note of the fact that unionized city workers in Houston are taking voluntary furloughs to help ease Houston's budget crisis. What a contrast this act of helping out Houston represents, in comparsion to the public-at-large in Houston which can be barely troubled to vote in municipal elections. Sometimes it is government that gets it right while individauls may be apathetic or even hostile in regards to the public good.

Public Citizen's TexasVox blog gives you ways to get involved to keep Texas from becoming the nation's radioactive waste dump by attending the public hearing in Austin on Dec 9 at 10am.

Local News: Bryan and College Station Schools Prepare for Budget Cuts

Schools Brace for Cuts
By Maggie Kiely

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

With the 2011 legislative session quickly approaching, school administrators in Bryan and College Station are bracing themselves for a 5 percent cut in state-supported funds.

The trimmings will likely come in personnel budgets, officials in both districts said, which means the likelihood of no teacher raises, hiring staff only where imperative and possibly eliminating positions.

Texas elected officials have predicted a shortfall as high as $25 billion in the state budget and have indicated serious reductions will have to be made during the legislative session.

Bryan Superintendent Mike Cargill said that, historically, when money has been tight at the state level, public education was typically spared serious cuts.

"We've been the sacred cow in the past," he said. "But not this time."

In Bryan, about 50 percent of revenue for the 2010-11 district budget is coming from the state, or about $57 million.

College Station will receive about $13.9 million this year from the state for its general fund, about 18 percent of the budget.

Because the district doesn't know where the reductions will be implemented, school officials said, it's hard to predict how much money will be lost if the expected 5 percent is cut.

It could be anywhere from $1.5 million to $6 million in Bryan, said Amy Drozd, chief financial officer for the district.

"Every district is going to feel it," she said. "How much is going to the difference for each district."

Eddie Coulson, superintendent for College Station, said administrators were still running scenarios to come up with potential loss amounts.

"All options will include significant reductions," he said. "The board clearly understands there won't be new revenue."

Cargill has been working in Texas school districts for 38 years and said he's never seen the school budgets in this bad of a position.

"Our system of school finance is pitiful," he said. "No business would do their financial services this way."

Coulson agreed, calling the situation "unprecedented."

Both superintendents said they find some relief in the fact that all Texas schools are going through the same circumstances.

To prepare for the impact, Bryan and College Station administrators started budget meetings early.

If the state is going to cut back on funding, it needs to relax its mandates, Cargill and Coulson agreed.

Both have suggested that the 22:1 elementary school student-teacher ratio be reassessed, that standardized testing should be relaxed so districts can focus on maintaining quality education with limited resources instead of teaching to a test, and the delay of the implementation of the new end-of-course exams that will eventually replace the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills tests.

"There are certainly other ways a state can gather performance of students other than testing every student every year," Coulson said, adding that randomized testing could be an option to consider.

Cargill said he supported putting a moratorium on all state standardized testing for two years, but acknowledged that would be difficult since standardized tests are federally mandated.

Bryan administrators and trustees started meeting with lawmakers this summer in anticipation of the budget reductions. They're explaining the situation they're in and submitting suggestions on ways to ease the pain.

Coulson and his staff has developed a legislative action plan, which is still in the draft stages and awaiting board approval.

Flexibility in operations and school finance are the key items of the plan, Coulson said, echoing the idea that fewer state mandates would help districts when it comes to dealing with reductions.

Once the plan is approved, school officials will meet with legislatures to press their issues, Coulson said.

College Station officials also have formed eight budget teams -- seven set up to look for areas where potential cuts can be made, and one searching for possible new revenue options.

Cargill and Coulson said they plan on making trips to Austin during the upcoming session.

"Our intent is to have an ongoing conversation with legislators related to bills and issues that come up," Coulson said.

Published on Sunday, December 05, 2010

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Texas Legislative Watch: The Shortfall

The Great Recession has affected everyone’s budget. From the federal government to the millions of Americans unemployed, budgets across the nation have been affected by the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. State budgets have been also hit hard by the recession. A recently released survey by the National Governors Association and the National Association of State Budget Officers found that states currently face a combined $41 billion in budget shortfalls for fiscal year 2012. According a report by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, state tax revenues were 8.4% lower in the 2009 fiscal year than in 2008, and an additional 3.1% lower in 2010, while the need for state-funded services did not decline.

Already during the last fiscal year those states dramatically cut their budgets, raised taxes, and relieved heavily on the $43 billion in federal Recovery Act funds to close those budget gaps. Over the past three fiscal years, states have closed $230 billion in budget gaps, and they done it by making significant budget cuts in education, social services and public safety, the state workforces and reduced aid to local governments. These cuts are having a disproportionate affect on the working and middle class, as services that they depend on are being either cut altogether or dramatically scaled back.

Despite the rhetoric of Texas Governor Rick Perry describing Texas as being relatively unaffected by the Great Recession, the state is facing a significant fiscal crisis. There is a debate about the actual size of the budget shortfall, and the numbers vary from anywhere between $15 billion and $30 billion depending on who is making the estimate. Governor Perry is touting the estimates of State Senator Steve Ogden (R-Bryan) which predict a budget gap of $15 billion or less.

The Legislative Budget Board has adopted a plan to cap the growth in the discretionary spending in the state budget at 8.92% in the budget that will be written in the next legislative session. Cuts of 5% from state agencies produced about $1.2 billion in savings in the 2010-11 budgets, although certain agencies were exempt. It appears that agencies will be expected to cut their budgets by another 2-3%. Reportedly approved cuts from earlier this year, together with the agencies' proposals to reduce spending by 10 percent in the next budget, would produce an estimated $4.2 billion in savings in the 2012-13 budgets.

While Texans are opposed to raising revenues through new taxes and want lawmakers to cut the budget to address the shortfall, a Texas Tribune poll also finds that Texans do not want lawmakers to cut the budgets of popular programs. Texans want to protect public and higher education, health care services for children and elderly, and the prison system from budget cuts. However, in all likelihood at least two out of three of those programs are going to face massive budget cuts. This seems to be consistent with the current American political character: we want to keep popular government programs but we don’t want to have to pay for them.

The 82nd Texas Legislature will face quite a challenge when it comes into session next month, and the incoming Republican majority will likely face a more difficult challenge from reality than it will from Democrats. With a near supermajority in the State House, members will need to bridge ideological divides in their own caucus as Democrats will be unlikely to make much of an impact in the legislative process. In the State Senate, Republicans do not have as large of a majority, but lawmakers have begun discussing eliminating the Texas version of the filibuster to remove the last obstacle to complete Republican rule. Republicans will then have to face the reality of closing a budget shortfall after painting themselves into an ideological corner. No new taxes. No use of the rainy day fund. Nothing but cuts.

It is important to note that it the Texas state budget is not exactly bloated. While education is likely to be one of the hardest hit areas of the budget, according to the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, Texas spends $7,561 per student which ranks 48th in the nation. In fact when you look at what Texas spends on the entire budget, according to Tax Foundation Texas spends $3,831 per capita, which is the least amount spent per capita in the entire nation. Republicans are going to have to cut one of the most comparably leans budgets in the country, while not raising taxes. Taxes which by the way are the seventh lowest in the nation.

As the budget shortfalls looms, State Senator Kirk Watson has called to revamp the budget process in a three-part program designed to make the budget process more responsible and accountable. Watson recently gave a speech to business and civic groups at the Bullock Texas State History Museum, during which he said that "For years, those in control have balanced the budget with a combination of debt, diversions and deception." During the speech Watson laid out a plan to make the budget process more transparent to the public, and to end unfunded mandates. While these reforms are unlikely to be supported by Republicans, Watson has begun to do exactly what Democrats need to: embody the party of alternative ideas that supports working and middle class Texans.


Tonight on Biased Transmission


Tonight on Biased Transmission our studio guest are Jeremiah and Jennifer McNichols, publishers of zrecommends.com, a website that provides feedback on a variety of consumer issues. Out topics of conversation will include a new consumer product safety database, greening the Girl Scouts, consumer safety & environmental issues in plastics, Earth friendly holidays, and regulatory threats to handmade toys and gifts.

Listen to Biased Transmission every Wednesday on 89.1FM KEOS College Station-Bryan from 6-7pm, to hear Teddy Wilson, Michael Alvard, Danny Yeager, and Ann Preston. If you have a question or comment you can post it here, or call the KEOS Bell Studios: 979-779-5367.

Biased Transmission on Facebook

Biased Transmission on LiveStream

Biased Transmission Online Archive of Shows