Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Tonight on Biased Transmission


Our guests this week on Biased Transmission will be David Kalil from the Brazos Buddhist Association and Lama Thinley from Nepal. Lama Thinley is here as a visiting scholar for the Anthropology Dept. at A&M and is living and teaching in the Brazos Valley with the Brazos Buddhist Association for one year. He is a scholar in the Nyingma tradition of Tibetan Buddhism.
Since Lama Thinley is still learning english, much of our interview will be directed at David Kalil, though David can interpret for Lama Thinley. It should be a very interesting and, dare we say, enlightening show! For more information on our guests, you can visit: http://brazosbuddhist.org

Listen to Biased Transmission every Wednesday on 89.1FM KEOS College Station-Bryan from 6-7pm, to hear Teddy Wilson, Michael Alvard, Danny Yeager, and Ann Preston. If you have a question or comment you can post it here, or call the KEOS Bell Studios: 979-779-5367.

Biased Transmission on Facebook

Biased Transmission Online Archive of Shows

Listen to Biased Transmission streaming live on Live Stream

Local News: Congressman Edwards Secures Funds for Local Industrial Employer

Chet Edwards Announces More Federal Funds for L3, Saying Jobs Are Safe for Now
By Mike Copeland (Tribune-Herald business editor)

From the Waco Tribune-Herald

With the U.S. Navy pledging an extra $8 million for research and testing on a spy plane, nearly 300 jobs at L-3 Communications in Waco are safe for now, U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Waco, said Monday.

Edwards visited the massive L-3 plant at Texas State Technical College airport to share the good news with employees.

Edwards said he has received a commitment from Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead that L-3 will be getting an additional $8 million for its work on the EP-3E surveillance plane.

“We plan no layoffs related to this program,” said James Burkhardt, president of Platform Integration for L-3 Communications.

Burkhardt, who joined Edwards in making the announcement, praised him for pursuing the funding for L-3.

EP-3E’s Steady Use

The EP-3E has been a workhorse in the Middle East, flying intelligence missions in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

The planes periodically fly into Waco’s L-3 plant for upgrades on their sophisticated equipment.

In the government’s current fiscal year, which ends in September, a total of $51.2 million is earmarked for the program in Waco.

“The Navy had planned to ask for approximately $50 million for this (in the next fiscal year), but in the reorganization of their priorities there was a last-minute change, and it got zeroed out,” Edwards said.

Suddenly, the jobs of 297 employees at L-3 who work on the EP-3E program began to look shaky.

1,900 Employees

The plant employs more than 1,900, making it Waco’s largest industrial employer.

Edwards said he took his concerns to Navy officials, including Roughead and Rear Adm. Terry Kraft.

He said they assured him the Navy had no problems with the workforce or the performance of L-3 in Waco.

“But the Navy was looking for funding to push its long-term unmanned aerial vehicle program,” Edwards said.

“I let (Roughead) and Adm. Kraft know that I respect the Navy’s interest in a UAV program, but that I was concerned that during the seven to 10 years it would take to get that program fully operational, we would possibly be taking risks for our troops in harm’s way by not continuing to upgrade the EP-3E in response to adaptations continually made by our enemies in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

After studying the matter, the Navy agreed to add $8 million for EP-3E “research, development, testing and evaluation,” and for possible upgrades to the plane’s intelligence-gathering capabilities, Edwards said.

The funds will be added to the 2010 governmental budget year.

But in 2011, which begins Oct. 1, no money is yet allocated to EP-3E for this testing, L-3 spokesman Lance Martin said.

Buying Time

Edwards said the $8 million allocation buys time for him and L-3 to pursue their case with the Navy “that the program should be kept vibrant.”

He said he thinks EP-3E planes can complement the unmanned spy planes, adding that L-3’s decade of work on the EP-3E could give it an inside track on contracts related to UAVs.

Work on the plane in McLennan County dates back at least a decade, when the Waco defense contracting facility was a unit of Raytheon.

At that time, Edwards secured a $61 million program converting a P-3 aircraft to an EP-3E filled with sensitive instruments to report on enemy communications and movements.

Robert Duke, senior director of Navy programs at L-3 in Waco, said seven EP-3E planes are parked at the plant now, undergoing testing and preparation for upgrades that Edwards said should continue.

Published on Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

First Look: Bryan Mayoral Candidates

Bryan residents will have several choices to make during the municipal elections in May, as there are four seats on the City Council that will be on the ballot. While residents from
Single Member Districts 1, 2, and 3 will all be voting on who will be their city councilmembers, all of the residents of Bryan will be voting for Mayor. This year current Single Member District (SMD) 3 Councilmember Jason Bienski, who is also serving as Mayor Pro Tem, is campaigning against former city councilmember Mitch Morehead. Jason Bienski was elected to the Bryan City Council in Single Member District 3 in 2005 and received 82% of the vote, and was reelected three years latter in 2008 again with 82% of the vote. While Morehead served on the city council as the At Large Councilmember, also as Mayor Pro Tem, from 2000 until 2003.

There will be several issues that will be important during the campaign, and what will be interesting is if either candidate can make significant distinctions between their positions on the issues. During a recent forum that was sponsored by the Downtown Bryan Association (DBA), both candidates agreed that there needs to be a focus on the improvement of the gateways to Downtown Bryan. Both candidates seem to be focusing their campaigns on the business and economic development of Bryan. Bienski specifically focused on needing to improve the infrastructure of Bryan, while Morehead focused on fiscal responsibility. During the DBA forum Morehead stated that he would focus on ensuring more government transparency, and that “we can’t let emotions drive what we do with taxpayer’s dollars.” This seems to suggest that Morehead believes that there has been a lack of transparency in the city government and that more than the best needs of the city are being taken into account when the council decides how to budget funds. While business development and the continued development of Downtown Bryan are important issues, there are many areas of Bryan that have not seen enough development.

Both candidates have been heavily involved in the community. In addition to being a city councilmember and a realtor with Brazosland Realty, Bienski is also on the Board of Directors of the Research Valley Partnership and the Board of Directors of the Brazos Valley Council of Governments. Bienski is also involved with the Bryan-College Station Intergovernmental Committee, the St. Joseph’s Foundation, and the American Heart Association. Mitch Morehead is currently the owner of Acme Glass, and has been involved with the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley, the Bryan Business Council, and the Habitat for Humanity. During the previous two campaigns Bienski enjoyed endorsements from the Bryan-College Station Eagle editorial board, and both times the Eagle touted Bienski’s experience in the community as the deciding factor. During the 2003 the Eagle endorsed Morehead’s opponent, and cited that Morehead was too focused on short term goals and did not have a broad long-term vision for Bryan. It is more likely that the Eagle will endorse Bienski than Morehead because of the success that the City of Bryan has had during Bienski’s tenure on the council, and the paper tends to endorse candidates who have more overall experience.

During an interview with WTAW 1620AM, Bienski touted his experience as Mayor Pro Tem and stressed the importance of maintaining the “continuity” of the Bryan City Council. Because of the effects of the economic downturn Bienski noted that he felt that the city should cut the budget in order to avoid a budget deficit and avoid raising taxes on Bryan residents. Morehead said that constituents have told him that developing the areas around Texas Avenue and College Avenue are important and that “they really like the idea of bringing Bryan back” during an interview with WTAW 1620AM. While Morehead said that he wants to see the economic development continue to more forward, he also said that more of a focus needs to be made on neighborhood integrity and crime prevention. The campaign for Bryan mayor does not have as much potential to be as the contentious as the campaign for College Station mayor, but it may be one of the more well funded and visible campaigns. While Bryan residents will all be voting for mayor, it should be interesting to watch how the down ballot campaigns in the single member districts affect the outcome of the mayoral election.

Video Lunch: Immigration Reform by the Numbers



From the Center for American Progress:
Comprehensive immigration reform will help lay the foundation for robust, just, and widespread economic growth. The alternative? Continuing our failed enforcement-only strategies that have brought us to this point or injecting those strategies with steroids and trying to deport 11 million people. That boils down to a $4 trillion policy choice.

Local News: Twenty-Five Years of Struggles for Texas A&M GLBT Community

A&M's Gay Community Marks 25 Years Out, Proud
By Vimal Patel

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

Larry Hickman saved recordings of threatening messages left on the Aggie-run referral service for gay students. And he still has a cardboard box of documents related to Texas A&M students' gay-rights struggle.

He kept it all, in part, because one day, he thought, he'd talk about those years again.

He will this week, after traveling from Illinois — where he is a philosophy professor — to Texas A&M, the university he left 17 years ago.

He's 67, but he speaks passionately about the events that, after a nearly decade-long struggle that reached the U.S. Supreme Court, led to the Texas A&M gay student group he advised receiving official recognition.

This week, A&M groups will celebrate the 25-year anniversary of the end of that battle, which began with a denial of recognition from then-chief student administrator John J. Koldus and ended with the nation's highest court refusing to take the case and allowing a lower court's ruling to stand.

Hickman has lost touch with the students he mentored. He doesn't remember much about them these days, he said, because they were typical college students, different in just one way: they were gay. He remembers the hardship some faced. There was Patricia, whose landlord kicked her out when she found out she was a plaintiff in the suit.

"There were kids who did not have the support they needed to be healthy students," Hickman said. "I can't tell you how many Aggie students I met who were paranoid. They felt displaced, isolated and not part of the community because of the bigotry."

The battle had waged for several years when Hickman volunteered to become adviser to the group in the early 1980s, about three years before the case reached the nation's highest court. He wasn't gay -- though at the time, he never made any comments about his sexuality: "Let them jump to any conclusion they want," he remembers thinking -- but he had gay friends.

Perhaps as important as any reason in his decision: "I had just got tenure that year."

Hostile Environment

Many Aggies were riled up following the filing of the lawsuit.

"Aggies are not queers," read a banner that hung from a third-floor window of Hart Hall in March 1977. "We don't want the Twelfth Man to be a homosexual!!!" stated a letter from former students in the campus newspaper, The Battalion. "Because he doesn't like queers!" explained a spokesman for a legislator who introduced a bill that would make it illegal for administrators to recognize gay-student organizations.

Gay Student Services, an off-campus group, had filed a request to be recognized to Koldus, the vice president for student affairs, in April 1976. The administrator denied the application, asserting two basic arguments. One, given that homosexual acts in Texas were illegal at the time, it would be inappropriate for Texas A&M to support a group likely to "incite, promote and result" in gay acts. And two, the stated purposes and goals of the university were not consistent with those of the student group.

The next year, the A&M System Board of Regents weighed in with a clear stance opposing a gay student group.

"So-called 'gay' activities run diabolically counter to the traditions and standards of Texas A&M University," a board resolution from a March 22, 1977, meeting stated, according to court documents (the board perhaps meant diametrically instead of diabolically).

"And the Board of Regents is determined to defend the suit filed against it by three students seeking 'gay' recognition and, if necessary, to proceed in every legal way to prohibit any group with such goals from organizing or operating on this or any other campus for which this Board is responsible."

A lower court ruled in favor of Texas A&M. But the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, supported the students, stating in an August 1984 ruling, "We think it clear from the facts that TAMU refused officially to recognize GSS based upon the homosexual content of the group's ideas."

On April 1, 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment, rejected Texas A&M's appeal, solidifying the appellate court's decision and giving birth to the first gay student group.

Koldus, who lives in College Station, could not be reached for this story. Organizers wanted him to speak at this week's celebration, but he declined. In a handwritten letter that's on file at Cushing Memorial Library, he said he wasn't confident in his memory of the events.

"My heart says thanks but my brain says no," Koldus wrote.

Hickman, remembered affectionately by some as a highly effective rabble-rouser, had clashed with Koldus on other occasions. He said he's sure Koldus is a "very nice person."

"But I think his job was to do what the administration and former students wanted," Hickman said.

A Strong Community

Today, Texas A&M has a Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Resource Center, one of only about 150 at universities nationwide. And it has a vibrant program called Aggie Allies, a network of about 800 people who have agreed to be resources for members of the GLBT population as they navigate their way through the university.

"I believe that when individuals that are part of a marginalized population are in an environment that is almost the extreme for their marginalization," said Lowell Kane, the center's director, "it actually in many ways enforces community development."

A cloth with a pink triangle hangs in the resource center. It was the symbol Nazis used to identify gays. In the next room, on Wednesday, a couple of students hung out near a 53-inch TV, a DVD collection and library. It's a "safe zone," they call it, where they can relax around others who won't judge them.

Riley Bryan, president of the student group GLBT Aggies, sat on a couch there. During his sophomore year, he was outed by cadets he had confided in. He remembers upperclassmen telling him he was never to directly look at them again.

The fifth-year senior, from Guymon, Okla., a town of about 10,000, came to Texas A&M because of his love of the Aggie Band. He said he has no regrets about joining the Corps, which he said gave him friends and a "completely unique experience." And now, he said, he's found his place on campus, and his comfort zone.

"I'm the happiest I've ever been on campus," he said.

Tom Spellman also was in the Corps. The Class of 1986 Aggie now works in computing information services. He also confided in someone that he was gay. After a falling-out, he said, the person told Spellman's dad, the commandant, and "everyone at the [Dixie] Chicken."

Spellman did the only thing he thought feasible for a cadet in the 1980s: "I lied through my teeth. I wasn't prepared to come out yet."

Today, he meets his partner of 23 years every day for lunch on steps near Cushing Memorial Library. Michael Jackson, who met Spellman while both were A&M students, works at the library.

Aggieland is changing, they said.

"More of the young kids don't care," Jackson said. "They go to school with people who are gay. They have family who are openly gay. They can put a face on it. There are positive portrayals in books and movies."

Still, in all these years, they've never felt comfortable enough to walk hand-in-hand on campus.

A Retrospective

The two-day conference -- dubbed "It's Time ... " -- kicks off Wednesday at the Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Building with the Queer of Color symposium. It will feature an academic discussion exploring the intersection between race, ethnicity and sexual orientation by top scholars in the field, organizers said.

The second day of the program, organized by the GLBT Professional Network, will be called "25 Years Later: LGBT in Higher Education." It begins at 9 a.m. with welcoming remarks by Texas A&M President R. Bowen Loftin.

Christine Stanley, Texas A&M's vice president for diversity, will deliver the keynote introduction. Interim Provost Karan Watson, the university's top academic official, is scheduled to be on a 3:30 p.m. panel called "Future."

Kane said it's meaningful that top-level officials are attending the conference.

"I think it represents that there is a firm commitment we are now seeing," the 27-year-old said. "In the past, many people would talk the talk, but here, we're seeing A&M walk the walk. We are seeing our top administrators taking an active role in conferences dealing with diversity and equity issues. It's a new time."

Hickman, who left Texas A&M in 1993 to become director of the Center for Dewey Studies at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, where he is today, will be on a 10:30 a.m. panel titled "Past."

He attracted statewide media interest surrounding A&M's treatment of gays, women and minorities. But he said his activism sprang from deep affection for the university. His wife and her family are Aggies, and he spent 19 years in Aggieland as a faculty member teaching philosophy.

"I'm very hopeful that A&M is moving rapidly in the right direction," he said. "It's a great university, and it has the potential to be even greater."

Published on Monday, March 29, 2010

Monday, March 29, 2010

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - March 29, 2010

Why not enjoy these posts from the Texas Political Alliance along with the beautiful spring weather?

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme sees vast differences between Perry, his bud David Dewhurst and Democrat Bill White. Democrats are for a robust public education while Republicans are doing their darnedest to kill it.

This week at Texas Vox, the commissioners at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) undermine the findings of their own staff in order to follow TCEQ’s mission statement that prioritizes economic development over protecting the environmental health of Texas. Are we surprised?

Are you playing the Barnett Shale economic shell game? Learn the rules at Bluedaze: DRILLING REFORM FOR TEXAS before you play.

The Texas Cloverleaf commentary on Congressional GOP members behaving like grown ups, if grown ups were 4 years old

Off the Kuff took a look at voting trends in Texas' fastest-growing counties. Hint: They getting bluer.

The week at Left of College Station, Teddy reports on the Coalition for Life possibly being in conflict with itself 501(c) 3 status by appearing connected to the Rob Curnock for Congress campaign. Left of College Station also takes a first look at the candidates for College Station mayor, and this week will take a first look at the candidates for Bryan mayor.

Libby Shaw updates us on GoodHair and companies reaction to HCR. It is not pretty. Perry and Abbott On Crusade to Block Health Care Benefits for Texans

Neil at Texas Liberal visited a Walgreen's in suburban Chicago in the week just past. While there he took a picture of chocolate praying hands and of a chocolate cross that are on sale for easter. Maybe these items are for people who adhere to the Chocolate God Theory.

WCNews at Eye On Williamson chronicles the fact that after the Democrats passed a historic health care bill the GOP went Crazy over health care.

Randy Noogie-Booger, the West Texas Congress critter who yelled "Baby killer!" during the debate on healthcare reform last week, was profiled by PDiddie at Brains and Eggs.

Bay Area Houston writes about When Teabaggers Become Terrorist

WhosPlayin, like a lot of other progressive bloggers this week, had thoughts on the historic passage of health care insurance reform.

Local News: College Station Considering Tax Increase

College Station May Implement Tax Increase
By Cassie Smith

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

College Station residents could see a 3-cent property tax increase next fiscal year to help pay for a new fire station and meet police department needs.

Jeff Kersten, the city's chief financial officer, said the proposal is still a "rough potential" and that, depending on sales tax revenue, taxpayers may be facing a 7-cent increase spread through 2014.

"That's based on an awful lot of assumptions here going into the future," he said.

Kersten said one major financial issue facing the city is the construction of Fire Station No. 6, which is expected to open in 2012.

"In the general fund, the big question is what will sales tax do," Kersten said.

In 2000, the city's property tax rate was at 42.93 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, meaning the owner of a home valued at $100,000 paid $429.30 in taxes. In 2002, it jumped to 47.77 cents per $100 assessed valuation but has since dropped to 43.94.

Fire and Police

The new fire station, which will be at the corner of University Drive and Tarrow Street, will require 18 firefighters, an ambulance and fire engine, Kersten said. The cost to operate the station is expected to be $1.5 million a year.

Staffing needs at the police department are also driving plans to recommend a tax increase, Kersten said. Exactly how many employees the department would add is still under consideration, he said.

"If you're able to have some more non-sworn positions, that can free up the officers you have to do more of the true police work," he said. "It's trying to find what the right balance for that is going to be."

The city is also looking to cut $1.5 million of spending in fiscal year 2011 to balance the budget, Kersten said.

"That's going to be one of the key things we're looking at as we look into this next year's budget estimates," he said.

The City Council voted last week to cut the annual Starlight Music Series from a schedule of six concerts to three. Other cost-cutting moves include keeping open positions vacant, eliminating salary increases this year and cutting back on travel and training expenses.

It is possible, Kersten said, that sales tax revenues will rebound and tax increases won't be necessary, but the city is preparing for the worst.

"There are still some potential storm clouds as the state decides how they are going to handle their budget coming up next year," he said.

City of Bryan

Bryan is dealing with a financial shortfall of its own, but city officials said they don't foresee a need to increase property taxes.

"I'm anticipating we're going to have to go into the budget for fiscal year 2011 and make some pretty tough choices," City Manager David Watkins said. "There are only a handful of cities across Texas that don't have this problem. For those of us who basically are not seeing new retail construction, or not very much, you're seeing the numbers drop just like the state numbers are dropping."

The city saw a comeback in sales tax revenue last month, but it's unclear if it was the start of a trend.

Chief Financial Officer Charles Cryan said the city is still looking for ways to cut $1.3 million from the budget. That's in addition to the $1.9 million cut last year, he said.

Watkins said a property tax increase isn't likely because the city recognizes residents, and particularly small businesses, are already suffering through a rough economy.

The last time the city raised taxes was in 1999, when the tax rate jumped to 63.67 cents per $100 assessed value. In 2001, the tax rate dropped to 63.64 cents per $100 assessed value, the current rate. The owner of a Bryan home assessed at $100,000 pays $636.40 in annual city taxes.

Cost-Cutting Measures

Watkins said the city is trying to trim costs by being more efficient with the use of lights, air-conditioning and other things. And open positions aren't being filled unless they're critical, he said.

But several areas will not see cutbacks, he said.

Putting off maintenance projects would only increase the cost of the work in the long run, he said, and employee training is critical to keeping good employees.

Capital improvement projects will continue, he said, because interest rates are low and the work helps boost the local economy.

Watkins said the budgets of every city department -- except Bryan Texas Utilities -- have been scoured for possible places to trim.

Officials have argued over the past few weeks whether BTU has provided a full budget or just a summary to the city.

As a city department, BTU's budget and any rate increases must be approved by the City Council. Some financial information is not available to the public because of competitive matters, but Watkins has argued that the information must still be made available to city officials.

Watkins said it's important to be able to review the budget to look for areas to trim or consolidate, as other departments have done, in difficult economic times.

"I think our taxpayers and ratepayers expect us to do that," Watkins said.

Published on Sunday, March 28, 2010

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Video Lunch: Progressives Debate Health Care "Victory"

Local News: Petition Launched to “Keep Wellborn as Wellborn”

Wellborn Residents Launch Petition
By Maggie Kiely

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

Members of Citizens for the Wellborn hung a banner at the intersection of Wellborn and Barron Roads that reads "Keep Wellborn as Wellborn, Texas."

Because Wellborn is within College Station's extraterritorial jurisdiction -- an area designated to cities by the state to provide room for future growth -- the decision to incorporate the area has to be approved by College Station officials.

After receiving a request from residents in favor of incorporating Wellborn, College Station City Council members decided to seek alternatives instead.

Members of the Wellborn group said they launched a petition to gain the support of College Station residents for incorporation.

Karen Severn, a member of Citizens for Wellborn, said the organization is hoping to get enough signatures from College Station residents so that city leaders have no choice but to allow a vote.

"It's very similar to the red light camera petition," she said.

Proponents of incorporation say it would give Wellborn residents the opportunity to control their sales tax dollars, draft zoning plans, establish their own city government and ordinances and to preserve the rural and historical feel of the area.

But College Station city officials said incorporating Wellborn isn't in the best interest of College Station residents.

A city of Wellborn would impede College Station's ability to grow to the south, said Bob Cowell, director of planning and developmental services for College Station.

The city would be nearly the size of Hearne and would exist between College Station and other parts of the ETJ where growth is likely, he said.

The boundaries of Wellborn would present other problems, he said.

"It's certainly inefficient," Cowell said. "If you have an area that isn't able to generate enough tax revenue and it's laid out inefficiently, it's going to become a problem when it comes to providing services."

City officials are considering alternatives to incorporation, including annexation and non-annexation agreements.

Severn said she's against annexation.

"It still would not provide us the ability to zone our town," she said. "We would just have to take whatever happens, and we don't want that."

City officials said if annexation did occur, they wouldn't encroach on Wellborn without the input of residents.

"We have noted that this is an area that has special rural character that community residents out there want to preserve," said Lance Simms, assistant director of planning and development services for College Station. "Through annexation, we could apply special zoning plans to tailor to their district."

In a non-annexation agreement, city officials said, they would agree not to annex Wellborn for an extended period in exchange for Wellborn residents agreeing to a list of stipulations.

City officials said they hope to be able to find common ground on the issue but have had a hard time getting members of Citizens for Wellborn to discuss the matter.

"Basically, the response from the Wellborn folks has been incorporation, incorporation, incorporation," Cowell said. "It would be equivalent to us saying annexation, annexation, annexation, and that's not what we're doing."

Published on Thursday, March 25, 2010

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Local News: Hasan Withdraws From Bryan School Board Campaign

Bryan Trustee Calling it Quits
By Maggie Kiely

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

A 12-year veteran of the Bryan school board recently withdrew his name from his re-election bid and said he's ready to hand over the reins.

Carl Hasan was elected as a trustee in 1998 and filed for re-election for the Single Member District 1 seat a few weeks ago. But last week he decided to pull out of the race.

As a result, Felicia R. Carter-Benford, who filed to run against Hasan, will be elected to the position when voters hit the polls on May 8.

"After 12 years of being on the board, I was happy to see somebody step up from Single Member District 1," Hasan said. "I don't see a need to fight over this position. She's a good person and I'm going to give her whatever help she will accept from me."

Hasan retired from the Army as a sergeant first class in 1996 after a 20-year career that included serving in Operation Desert Shield/Storm.

Before considering running for school board in 1998, Hasan said, he thought about being a teacher. But after realizing that wasn't the job for him, he became active in Bryan school organizations and learned the inner workings of the district.

A former trustee encouraged him to run when the position became open more than a decade ago, and the rest is history, he said.

Hasan said helping establish the district's Advancement Via Individual Determination program is one of his major accomplishments. The college-readiness program offers participating students opportunities they otherwise may not have by providing them with skills and knowledge essential to success.

Another proud moment for Hasan, he said, was when he voted to allow students who didn't pass the TAKS but fulfilled all other graduation requirements to participate in graduation ceremonies.

Although he lost the fight in 2007 and the board voted not to allow about 20 students to walk across the stage, Hasan said he was able to get his point across and, ever since, students who show considerable efforts in meeting all graduation requirements have been able to participate in commencement ceremonies.

Hasan's two children graduated from Bryan High School in 2003 and 2005.

He said he'll continue to stay involved with improving the district.

"I know I could have done some things better, but I think I've done well," he said.

Published on Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

First Look: College Station Mayoral Candidates

College Station residents will have to choose between reelecting incumbent Mayor Ben White and electing previous City Councilmember Nancy Berry. White was elected mayor in 2007, defeating current City Councilmember in Place 3, Dennis Maloney, with 56% of the vote. In 2005 White was elected to City Council Place 1, but ran unopposed. Berry was elected to the City Council Place 6 in 2004, receiving 57% of the vote, and defeating two other candidates including Lynn McIlhaney who was elected to City Council in 2006. Then in 2006 Berry was defeated by current City Councilmember in Place 6, Dave Ruesink, and only received 41% of the vote.

What are going to be some of the issues during this year’s campaign? The proposed convention center, the proposed new city hall, and the proposed new senior center are all going to be issues that Berry will be campaigning against. While White will be campaigning on “see projects through to the end” including the convention center and the new city hall. While other issues will also play a role, it appears as if the city budget and the spending by the city are going to be the major issues. Development projects may also be an issue, and environmental concerns may also play a part in the campaign. It should be interesting to find out how the proposed incorporation of Wellborn develops during the campaign, as White has and the current City Council have not seemed favorable to the incorporation while Berry has stated that the Wellborn community needed to be given a voice. It is clear that White is going to brand his campaign as that which continues the current course that the City Council is on, and that Berry is going to be branding her campaign as a change in leadership.

Both candidates have enjoyed endorsements from the Bryan-College Station Eagle. In 2007 the Eagle endorsed White for mayor, in part because “White has a much calmer personality [than his opponent], perhaps one more suited to leading a disparate group of council members at meetings that can sometimes become contentious.” When Berry first ran for City Council Place 6 in 2004, the Eagle endorsed Berry over two other candidates because “it is time to let others with fresh ideas have a chance.” In the 2006 municipal election, the Eagle endorsed Berry for City Council, and cited that “Berry has actual council experience and has learned the correct way to serve” and urged her “to be a leader in ensuring that city government is as transparent and open to all as possible.” This was in the wake of Berry and other City Councilmembers becoming involved in a controversy over the way the firing of former City Manager Tom Brymer was handled. Which candidate will the Eagle endorse? The Eagle tends to endorse incumbents more than challengers, so it is more likely that White receives the endorsement than Berry.

During an interview with WTAW 1620AM, White acknowledged that not all of the decisions the City Council has made have been popular but have made decisions that have “moved the city forward as we continue to grow.” Some of White’s goals if reelected will be to open fire station number six, continue beautification along FM 2818 and other entryways, and to continue moving forward with plans and studies related to the convention center. Berry said that “I think we are just not listening to the citizens, and we need to put some sanity back in the city council,” during an interview with WTAW 1620AM. The campaign for College Station mayor should be a fascinating campaign to watch, and considering that both candidates have significant political experience it should be interesting whether residents of College Station vote for the continuation of the current policies or a change in direction.

Video Lunch: Orwellian Revision of History in Texas Classrooms



In his book, Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell described a corrupt government which didn't approve of its actual history, so they changed it to one which would made it easier to manipulate the populace. Religious extremists on the Texas State Board of Education now seek to do the same thing, -after having already vandalized the studies of science and health- in the name of censorship and propaganda, and in the hope that all the other states bow to the whim to Texas fundamentalists.

Local News: AMA President Praises Health Care Reform

AMA Head Praises Reform
By Matthew Watkins

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

Bryan doctor and American Medical Association President James Rohack on Monday praised the weekend passage of a comprehensive health care reform bill, but stressed that the U.S. still has many improvements to make in its medical sector.

"What the legislation did is took a step forward to provide a better stability in the health care system," he said in a telephone interview with The Eagle as he traveled between Austin and Bryan.

He acknowledged, though, that a significant portion of the population remains angry about the overhaul.

"Because we are looking at change, a lot of people don't like change, and I have recognized that there has been a lot of rhetoric and not a lot of facts," he said. "People are looking and taking misinformation as the truth and because of that, it is very difficult to have a non-emotional discussion."

He said he expects that anger to subside once the bill is implemented and people understand how the inner parts work.

The bill eliminates the ability of health insurers to exclude coverage to people with pre-existing conditions; prohibits lifetime limits in payments insurers will make on behalf of customers and will bring many more people under the protection of health insurance, he said.

"So basically what that does is it helps patients get affordable health insurance," Rohack said.

But instead of celebrating a legislative victory, Rohack said the AMA already has shifted its attention to pressing needs.

A so-called "doc fix" was left out of the bill, and Democratic leadership have promised to take up the issue later in the month. Under the current Medicare formulas, doctor reimbursement rates could be cut by 21 percent in April in order to keep them under the pre-set Sustainable Growth Rate.

That rate was mapped out in legislation from 1997 designed to balance the budget, but has been temporarily repealed each of the last seven years.

Rohack and the AMA have argued that such cuts would force doctors to lay off staff members and likely make it difficult for Medicare patients to find doctors. They are asking for a permanent fix.

"A temporary Band-Aid, which is what Congress has done seven times over the last seven years, has just grown the problem," he said.

Rohack -- who lives at a ranch in Bryan and works in Temple as medical director for system improvement and director of the Center for Healthcare Policy -- serves as a spokesman and advocate for the hundreds of thousands of doctors who are members of the AMA. He has spent significant time in Washington lobbying for doctors, and held numerous meetings with lawmakers over the past year.

He said he'll continue to monitor the bill and fight for other needs that he sees in the health care industry before his year-long appointment expires in June.

"The AMA views what Congress did yesterday from a historical perspective," he said. "It was an important step, but it is not the final step. Just like a physician, you finish with open heart surgery but you don't just leave the patient alone, you need to care for him. We are still in the intensive care unit caring for the American health sector."

Published on Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Monday, March 22, 2010

The Coalition for Life, Political Campaigns, and 501(c) 3

The Brazos Valley Coalition for Life is a 501(c) 3 non-profit organization, which gives the Coalition for Life (CFL) a tax exempt status. According to the Internal Revenue Service, a 501(c) 3 organization must be “organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.”

However, CFL appears on the surface to be in conflict with the IRS regulations surrounding 501(c) 3 organizations, as the photograph below shows, the CFL office displays prominently several Rob Curnock campaign signs. This location is at 3601 East 29th Street, Suite 8 in Bryan, Texas, and is still listed on the CFL web site under contact information. The CFL does list another location down the street, 4012 East 29th Street, as the CFL “new house.” However, the CFL sign is still prominently displayed on the 3601 East 29th Street location.


The Rob Curnock for Congress Campaign listed the 3601 East 29th Street, Suite 8 office space as their Brazos County campaign office on the campaign web site under Federal Election Commission records, the Curnock campaign paid $3,000 in rent for “Brazos HQ” listed at the 3601 East 29th Street location. The rent payment from the Curnock campaign is listed to “Brookwood Square, LP.”

The facts as they are now is that the Curnock campaign is using the previous headquarters of the CFL as its current headquarters, however, the CFL still list the previous location on its web site. The CFL sign is still prominently displayed, which gives the impression that the CFL supports the political campaign of Rob Curnock for Congress. In order to avoid the appearance of supporting a political campaign and being in conflict with their tax exempt status, the CFL should immediately remove their sign from their previous office. Otherwise it appears that the CFL may be participating in campaign activity for a political candidate.

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - March 22, 2010


The Texas Progressive Alliance's weekly blog roundup will reach 32 million more Americans regardless of their pre-existing conditions.

Last week, TXsharon made a video statement at the EPA Public Hearing on the proposed ozone standards.

Who Needs a Proctologist when you have former State Representative Rick Green running for the Texas Supreme Court?

This week on Left of College Station, Teddy looks at the voter turnout in the Bryan and College Station municipal elections and has to ask the question if minority rules? Teddy also unpacks the misleading poll on health care reform that the Chamber of Commerce commissioned to attack Democrats in conservative congressional districts. Left of College Station also covers the week in headlines.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme wants to know why monuments to racism and fear are so important to Republicans. Why not spend taxpayer dollars on something constructive like education or health care?

WCNews at Eye On Williamson posts on the continuation of skyrocketing homeowners insurance rates in Texas Homeowners insurance corporations - increasing our pain, Perry, GOP sit idly by.

Off the Kuff writes about tough times for school districts. Get ready for another school finance lawsuit, because it's coming sooner or later.

The Texas Cloverleaf tells the Dallas Trinity Tollers I told ya so.

Phillip Martin at Burnt Orange Report has covered Rick Perry's "secret" border plan in great detail -- namely, the lies and politics Perry has thrust into a very serious and dangerous situation along the Texas-Mexico border. Be sure to read his post, Rick Perry's Political Grandstanding Misrepresents Definition of "Spillover Violence and follow the links at the bottom of that post to learn much, much more.

WhosPlayin's story last week about a tax-dodging Lewisville City Councilman resulted in a tearful admission at the next council meeting, where news cameras were running. WhosPlayin follows up on the results of that meeting, and analyzes the media coverage and truthfulness of the councilman in his response.

As if sea level rise, stronger hurricanes, and more extreme weather events weren't bad enough... not the Golden Cheeked Warbler too! Texas Vox is sad to report this week that birds of a feather feel the heat from climate change.

A little March madness in the form of preparations for his Senate district convention overtook PDiddie at Brains and Eggs, and he lumped in two updates on the campaigns of Bill White and Lakeisha Rogers (completely unrelated, trust him).

LibbyShaw over at TexasKaos, checks in on Representative Rep. Louie Gohmert who, in speaking to a Tea Bagger rally "declared that "demons" - yes, demons - have invaded the capital (and likely the souls of Democrats), forcing lawmakers to mislead the public about the content of the health care bill." Check out the rest of the fun here: TX U.S. House Rep: "Demons have Invaded the Capital".

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Universal Health Care: Right or Privilege?

As the vote on health care reform nears, I looked back at the arguments I made for health care reform at the beginning of this debate. I think it is important that as politics have completely enveloped this debate that we step back and remember why we are arguing for reforming health care in this country in the first place. What it comes down to is rather simple, that while the economic and political arguments are the strongest on the side of supporting reforming health care the most important argument is the moral argument. The following is the argument I made for health care reform in September of 2008:

The mostly controversial and significant public policy debate today is about health care reform, and what the best way is to provide access to health care for all people in America. However, this debate is not new, but in fact has been debated for over a century. Much of this debate centers around one fundamental question: what is the role of the government? On one side of the issue you have those that argue that the government does not have a role in providing or ensuring that all people have access to health care. While the other side holds the position that the federal government has a role in providing for the general welfare which would include ensuring access to health care.

The government has played an active role in ensuring that the least privileged of Americans receive assistance and through many different programs the government promotes the general welfare of all Americans. Our government is a government of people, and whatever its failures in the past or future it can serve everyone. No one should be left behind. Universal health care should be the goal.

It is often asserted that America has the best health care in the world; however, it would be more accurate to state that America has the best health care in the world for those that are able to afford health care. The reality is that the United States spends more on health care and less people have access to health care. The United States is expected to spend $2.5 trillion on health care in 2009, which is 17.6 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).

According to a Kaiser Family Foundation study, health insurance premiums have increased 119 percent for employers since 1999 and employee spending for health insurance coverage has increased 117 percent during the same time period. Also, according to the United States Census Bureau, 46 million Americans, or 18 percent of the population, are uninsured. Also, due to the economic downturn millions of Americans who are losing their employment will also lose their insurance.

The high cost of health care does not only affect those that do not have health insurance, those that have coverage also must deal with escalating cost. A clinical research study published in the American Journal of Medicine found that in 2007 medical cost contributed to over 60% of all bankruptcies, and between 2001 and 2007 the portion of bankruptcies caused by medical cost rose 50%. Over three quarters of bankruptcies caused by medical expenses happened to people that had health insurance.

One solution that opponents of universal health care suggest is malpractice lawsuit reforms. However, Texas lawmakers have passed dramatic malpractice lawsuit reforms legislation, and yet there are a larger percentage of uninsured people in Texas than in any other state. Malpractice lawsuit reforms where passed with the reasoning that it would increase the number of doctors in Texas, and therefore increase access to health care. However, 114 of the 254 counties are designated primary-care shortage areas, and twenty-seven counties in Texas have no doctors at all.

The health care crisis affects a broad spectrum of Americans, but creating a public option is the most significant way to bring down the cost of health care and to provide universal access to health care. A public option would simply be another way of providing health insurance, and it would compete with the other insurance companies. By providing people this option it will lower the high cost of the uninsured raise the cost of health care for everyone.

Perhaps the most compelling argument for universal health care is an ethical and moral argument. In the not too distant past many people in Bryan-College Station remember when Hurricane Ike devastated the Gulf Coast of Texas, and left many people, through no fault of their own, without the resources to continue providing for their own needs. Likewise the economic downtown has affected many Americans, and has left many people, through no fault of their own, without employment and unable to afford health insurance. The reasons that we should provide government assistance to the people whose lives were affected by Hurricane are the same reasons we should provide government assistant to the people whose lives have been affected by the economic downturn. The ethical thing to do is to provide assistance to those among us that need assistance.

This debate is about the idea that we all have a fundamental right to health care and that for too long many of us have been denied this right. No one should be denied the right to health care because of a genetic condition that they were born with, and no one should face financial ruin because of the medical cost of treating cancer. Every American, no matter their socioeconomic status, should be able to walk into their doctor’s office without having to ask themselves whether or not they can afford to be sick in America.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Week in Headlines


War and Peace
Another U. S. Atrocity in Afghanistan

Veterans Issues
Another Gulf War Syndrome?

Environment
Governors' Wind Energy Coalition Urges National Renewable Energy Standard

Education
Why Teachers' Unions Matter

Health Care
The Americans Who Can’t Wait for a Better Bill

Immigration
Stop the Deportation of Immigrant Military Veterans

Reproductive Rights
More Than Onerous

Women’s Issues
Which nation has smallest pay gap for women?

Race and Racism
Racial Profiling Rears Its Ugly Head

From the Blogs
Burnt Orange Report:
Don't Mess with Texan Progressives

Texas Liberal:
You Can’t Learn About Thomas Jefferson In Texas Schools

VetVoice:
Poll of Post-9/11 Vets Reveals Troops Largely Comfortable with Gay Service

Video Lunch: Jon Stewart Has a Progressive Cancer

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Intro - Progressivism Is Cancer
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Reform


The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Conservative Libertarian
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Reform

Local News: WallBuilders Speaker is Candidate for Texas State Senate

September 11th Survivor Birdwell Will Run in Special Election for Averitt's State Senate Seat
By Michael W. Shapiro (Tribune-Herald staff writer)

From the Waco Tribune-Herald

Retired Lt. Col. Brian Birdwell, a public speaker from Granbury who survived the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the Pentagon, said Thursday he’s running in a May special election for the state Senate seat vacated by Kip Averitt, R-Waco.

Birdwell, who was badly burned during the attack, started a ministry with his wife that provides support to burn victims.

He also is a featured speaker of WallBuilders. The organization describes itself as “dedicated to presenting America’s forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on the moral, religious and constitutional foundation on which America was built.”

“After talking with conservatives across the district, I’m very encouraged by the strong, positive response received so far,” Birdwell said in a release.

“I believe this race is wide- open, so today I’m declaring my candidacy for state Senate and look forward to facing another challenge with determination and resolve.”

The release cited Birdwell’s military experience, specifically his work on the U.S. Army’s budget.

State lawmakers will face a budget deficit that could be as high as $15 billion. Birdwell said if elected, he would stand up to the federal government and use a conservative approach to the budget.

The release included quotes from several GOP officials, including Bill Crocker, a Republican National Committee member from Texas who called Birdwell a “genuine, articulate conservative.”

During the recent GOP primary, Crocker was a vocal supporter of Gov. Rick Perry and critic of U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Perry’s opponent.

Crocker told the Washington Times that “Kay has risked injuring the leader of our November ticket for no good reason — at least no reason she has ever ar- ticulated.”

Praising candidate

WallBuilders founder David Barton, the former Texas GOP state vice chairman, also praised Birdwell’s character.

Barton has been in the news lately as the State Board of Education reworked Texas’ social studies curriculum. Barton served as an expert adviser during the process.

The board made a splash when it dropped President Thomas Jefferson — who is considered to have coined the phrase “separation of church and state” — from the state’s world history curriculum.

Two other Republicans, Burleson’s Darren Yancy and Waco’s David Sibley, have announced plans to compete in the special election. The last day for candidates to file is April 7.

Published on Friday, March 19, 2010

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Video Lunch: Tiffany's Story and Health Care Reform



The story of Tiffany Campbell: a mother of three from South Dakota, who deals with a complicated pregnancy and abortion that was both emotionally and financially challenging for her and her family.

Local News: GLBT Group Has Refreshing Idea

GLBT Group Trying to Get Local Center

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

Some members of the local chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Transgender community are gathering resources in an effort toward opening a community center.

The members have applied for a $50,000 grant from Pepsi for a GLBT Community Center in the Brazos Valley. The grant is determined by popular vote. The top 10 grants that received the most votes will receive funding for their grant.

Officials are asking people to vote for the cause at www.refresheverything.com/bcsglbtcenter.

Individuals can vote once a day, every day in March.

Members said their goals for the center are to provide a home for GLBT families and support groups, a place for entertainment and a networking center.

For more information about the Pepsi grant, contact Rachel Boenigk at 777-3081.

For more information about the center or how to help contact Lowell Kane at 516-857-8636 or lbkglbt@gmail.com.

Published on Thursday, March 18, 2010

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Bryan-College Station Election Turnout: Minority Rule?

In May the citizens of College Station and Bryan will vote in municipal elections and citizens from each city will determine who will represent them on their respective city councils. This year both cities will also be voting for mayor, and while College Station residents will have the chance to reelect their current mayor residents of Bryan will have a new mayor after the election. So how many people decide who will be representing the residents of the two cities?

An estimated 72,000 people live in Bryan and in 2008 there where about 42,000 registered voters; an estimated 68,000 people live in College Station and in 2009 there where about 48,000 registered voters. There are about 90,000 registered voters in Brazos County, and an average of 43,828 residents cast ballots in the general elections over the last five election cycles. During a general election about 49% of registered voters or about 31% of all residents participate in the democratic process. However, during municipal elections the number of people who participate in the democratic process is much less.

Over the last five years an average of 5,399 residents, in Bryan and College Station combined, voted in municipal elections. College Station has consistently had higher voter turnout than Bryan, however, this is mainly due to the fact that Bryan has single member districts and all residents of College Station vote for every councilmember. In the last five municipal elections an average of 3,852 College Station residents have voted and an average of 1,182 Bryan residents have voted. The average voter turnout in College Station for municipal elections is about 8%, and the average voter turnout in Bryan is about 3%. About 6% of registered voters in both cities participate in the democratic process on the local level. When you look at the entire picture, roughly 4% of the people are speaking for the citizens of Bryan-College Station.

What is voter turnout going to look like this year? The highest voter turnouts are during years in which both cities are electing mayors, although the highest turnout for both cities in the last five years was in 2008 municipal elections when over 5,400 College Station residents voted. However, the highest combined turnout in the last five years was during the 2007 municipal elections when 7,000 residents voted in both cities. This year, in College Station, there are only two contested city council elections, Mayor and Place 2, and the last two elections with only two contested city council elections the turnout was 3,161 in 2006 and 3,054 in 2004. But there was not an election for mayor during either one of those elections so this year I would expect the voter turnout to be around 3,500.

Voter turnout in the Bryan municipal elections may be harder to predict. There are four contested city council positions, including mayor, for which Bryan residents will be casting their ballots. There are also two contested Bryan Independent School District school board trustee positions. The last election in which Bryan residents chose a mayor, in 2007, the voter turnout was as high as it has been in the last five years, with 3,335 residents casting their ballots. What will the turnout about be like in the single member districts? Voter turnout is hard to predict in SMD 1 since the last time a councilmember was elected representing that district they where unopposed. The average voter turnout in SMD 2 over the last two election cycles in which there was a councilmember up for election there was about 260 people. However, the last two election cycles in which there was a councilmember up for election in SMD 3 the average voter turnout was 736. Despite the low voter turnout in SMD 1 and 2 in the past, both those districts have incumbent candidates facing challengers, and this could help drive up voter turnout. The turnout for the Bryan municipal elections may be between 3,500 and 4,000 voters.

It is unfortunate that so few people participate in the local municipal elections, so much so that in a sense residents of Bryan and College Station are under a form of minority rule.

Tonight on Biased Transmission


Tonight on Biased Transmission, KEOS 89.1FM, March 17, 2010, our studio guest is Karen Severn, Secretary, Citizens for Wellborn. We will discuss the proposed College Station annexation of Wellborn. After being informed they could not have two representatives on the show, the city of College Station refused to send anybody.

Listen to Biased Transmission every Wednesday on 89.1FM KEOS College Station-Bryan from 6-7pm, to hear Teddy Wilson, Michael Alvard, Danny Yeager, and Ann Preston. If you have a question or comment you can post it here, or call the KEOS Bell Studios: 979-779-5367.

Biased Transmission on Facebook

Biased Transmission Online Archive of Shows

Listen to Biased Transmission streaming live on Live Stream

Video Lunch: Student Aid and Financial Responsibility Act



From the Center for American Progress:
Pedro do la Torre explains what the Student Aid and Financial Responsibility Act is, why we need it, and why it's paired with health reform legislation.

Local News: Company’s Closure Causes Job Losses in Bryan-College Station

West Corporation to Close Bryan Site
By Michelle Casady

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

It's unclear how the closure of West Corp.'s Bryan call center will affect the company's contract with the Research Valley Partnership, officials said Tuesday.

The company will lay off 260 people and close its University Drive campus May 15, employees were told Tuesday morning.

"Over the past several months, we have experienced a decrease in our call volume for the client we serve in that center," said David Pleiss, vice president of investor and public relations for the Omaha, Neb.-based company. "So the downturn in business combined with our lease expiring this fall just made this a good decision."

The company came to Bryan in late 2005 after being lured by the Research Valley Partnership with an incentives package valued at more than $500,000 -- $250,000 came from the RVP.

As part of the agreement, West Corp. was required to maintain a $15 million payroll and bring in $3 million in new investments over several years, said Todd McDaniel, chief executive of the RVP.

"We have legal agreements that require a certain performance and the reimbursement of incentives in the event of default," he said. "We're going to do our job and take the necessary steps. Certainly one option is to request the reimbursement of incentives, which is generally what we do."

Over the past four years, McDaniel said, the company paid out $51 million in payroll and brought in more than $4 million in investments.

Pleiss said all employees of West Corp. have been encouraged to apply for a program called West at Home, which allows employees to essentially do the same job they would in the call center from their homes.

It's possible that all 260 employees could find work through the program, he said.

The announcement isn't an indication of a weakened local economy, Bryan-College Station Chamber of Commerce President Royce Hickman, but a reflection of a weakened national economy.

"What happens is these national companies that operate outside of the Bryan-College Station area are being impacted by the economy much more than we are locally," he said, referencing the recent closures of Circuit City and Linens 'n Things. "But they have to make cuts to consolidate their businesses."

The Chamber is hosting a job fair April 13 at the College Station Hilton from 2 p.m. until 6 p.m., he said, which could provide help to soon-to-be former West Corp. employees.

In June, the company announced 160 employees would be laid off by August after losing an account with American Express.

McDaniel said the closure comes after West Corp. received word from another client, Dish Network, that it would no longer be needing the Bryan call center's services.

Published on Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Health Care Reform Support By the Numbers

It is clear that the debate surrounding health care reform is going to continue long past this week’s possible vote, and the debate is going to have a significant impact on the midterm elections this November. If health care reform is passed then Democrats who voted for it will have something tangible to campaign on, and the Republicans have already begun to make plans on campaigning on repealing health care reform. The Republicans did the same thing after the New Deal, but that is a subject for another blog. Another thing that has been made clear is that special interests groups are going to be heavily campaigning against health care reform, and because of a recent Supreme Court decision corporations are also going to be able to directly influence the public debate.

The US Chamber of Commerce is targeting Democrats in Congress with a recent poll that it commissioned in ten Congressional districts around the country, including Texas Congressional District 17. The respondents where asked a series of questions beginning with what they thought health care reform priorities should be: improving the quality of health care, lowering the costs of health care, or covering more of the uninsured. Then they where asked to think about the “overall health care reform plan being discussed in Congress” and whether or not they would say they “generally support or oppose that reform plan.” The poll then asked respondents to “agree or disagree with each of the following statements about health care,” and provides a series of negative statements about health care reform.

The statements that respondents where asked to agree or disagree with included “reforms being discussed will raise my health care costs,” “reforms being discussed will increase the deficit,” “reforms being discussed will cause my taxes to go up,” “reforms being discussed will expand government control over health care,” “new taxes and fees charged to health care companies will get passed on and will mean higher health care costs for me.” So, instead of asking respondents about what they think about the actual proposals in the health care reform legislation, respondents are asked what they think about a list that looks as though it could have come from Republican talking points.

The reforms in the health care legislation will not raise health care costs, and are in fact designed to lower the cost of health care overall. The legislation has been determined by the Congressional Budget Office to actually lower the deficit, and while some taxes will need to be increased that vast majority of Americans will not see their taxes increased. Also, there will not be higher health care cost for the majority of Americans, because of increased competition that is designed to lower health care cost overall. The idea that health care reform constitutes an expansion of government control over health care is simply the way in which the Republican Party and special interests groups have been able to paint reform with a broad brush to influence a public that has become mistrustful of government after eight years of Republican incompetence.

How did voters in Congressional District 17 respond to the survey? When respondents in District 17 where asked to think about the “overall health care reform plan being discussed in Congress, would you say you generally support or oppose that reform plan,” 60% said that they opposed the plan while 30% said they support the plan and 10% did not know. District 17 had the highest percentage of those surveyed who where against the plan, but only 4.4% higher than the average of the other ten districts. In general this seems to be higher than the average national poll, however, the recent Gallup poll reported that 48% of respondents where against the current health care legislation.

When asked if the current legislation would increase health care cost, 65% of constituents in Congressional District 17 said that they believed it would, which is the highest among the ten congressional districts. Even more of the same respondents believed that health care reform would increase the deficit, once again the highest among the districts with 75% agreeing. The same amount believe that their taxes would increase and 76% believe that it is increasing government control over health care, both of which are the highest among the districts. In fact only one question was not agreed with by the constituents of Congressional District 17 more than any other district; residents of this district and the Pennsylvania 4th and the Nevada 3rd all agreed 69% of the time that higher health care cost will get passed on to them.

However, what the real purpose of publishing this poll is to convince Democrats in Congress that if they oppose the health care legislation, even if they supported it before, that their constituents would be more likely to reelect them:

“Voters in each district would be more likely to support their representative if he or she votes against health care reform in the spring. Regardless of whether their representative in the House voted for or against the House bill last November, these voters prefer that their representative oppose the current plan.”

What the poll is trying to highlight is that out of the respondents from congressional districts whose representative voted for health reform an average of 31% would continue to support them if they voted for health care reform again and an average of 43% would switch to opposition if they voted for health care reform again. What does that mean for Congressman Chet Edwards is Congressional District 17? Not much. Congressman Edwards voted against health care reform in the fall and already announced that he will not be supporting the current legislation. Even if he did support this current legislation only 18% would switch to supporting him (the lowest out of any of the congressional districts), while 50% would maintain their oppositions and 23% of which for it would make no difference. But why are these numbers worthless? Because the poll never ask if the respondents support their representative in the first place, and there is not a breakdown by party lines. The only thing that this poll might show of significance is that on average 72% of the 400 people surveyed in Texas Congressional District 17 are misinformed about the current health care reforms.

In the press released by the Chamber of Commerce, Bruce Josten, the executive vice president of Government Affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, was quoted as saying, “There should be absolutely no question in anyone’s mind how Americans view this health care bill. This legislation is among the most unpopular proposals in recent memory and Members of Congress would be well advised to listen to their constituents’ concerns.” The public opinion would not perhaps have been in part shaped by advertising and lawmakers may been influenced by perhaps special interests groups such as the Chamber of Commerce?

According to a report by the National Journal the Chamber of Commerce far outspent any other group lobbying in 2009, spending $123.3 million lobbying activities that year compared to $62.3 million in 2008. The Chamber of Commerce spent nearly five times more on lobbying than even PhRMA, and more than PhRMA, AARP, the AMA, the Business Roundtable, the American Hospital Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, and America's Health Insurance Plans combined. The numbers look different when you realize the questions are loaded, and the money behind the questions is invested not in ensuring quality health care for Americans but in corporate interests.

Video Lunch: Wars Sending U.S. Into Ruin (Part 2)



From the Real News Network:
Eric Margolis: Democrats and Republican leadership buy into "Pax Americana”

Local News: Congressman Edwards to Vote Against Health Care Reform

Chet Edwards Says He Will Vote Against Senate's Health Care Bill
By Michael W. Shapiro Tribune-Herald staff writer

From the Waco Tribune-Herald


Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Waco, announced Monday he will vote against the Senate’s version of health care reform legislation when it comes up for a vote in the U.S. House, expected later this week.

Edwards voted against the House’s version of health care legislation in November, and some local Democrats and labor groups had expressed hope he would be more amenable to the less expensive and less expansive Senate version.

But Edwards made it clear in a conference call with reporters that his vote would not change. Edwards also said he would vote against a package of changes to the Senate bill that Democrats are hoping to pass through a process called budget reconciliation.

Chet Edwards said he was "especially disappointed" the legislation did not include a proposal he backed that would have reduced the scale of the program if costs ran high.
“I voted ‘no’ on the House health care reform bill, and I will be a ‘no’ vote on the Senate health care reform bill,” Edwards said. “At a time of massive federal deficits, I believe these bills could make those deficits worse.”

More specifically, Edwards said he was “especially disappointed” the legislation did not include a proposal he backed that would have reduced the scale of the program if costs ran high.

“No one can predict with absolute certainty the new cost and cost savings of such a massive reform bill over 10 to 20 years,” Edwards said. “That is why I believed it was important to include a trigger to automatically reduce the cost of the bill if the projections turned out to be wrong, particularly since our nation is facing such serious federal deficits.”

According to the Congressional Budget Office’s latest cost estimate of the Senate bill, the projected price tag for the Senate bill is $875 billion during 10 years.

The estimate anticipates a reduction in future deficits of $118 billion because of new taxes and cost-cutting in the bill.

By Monday afternoon, the CBO had not issued an estimate of the costs of the various changes Democratic leaders also are hoping to pass along with the bill.

Reform Still Needed

Edwards reiterated his concerns about the rising cost of health insurance and the ability of insurers to deny or charge pricey premiums for people with pre-existing medical conditions, saying most people want to see something done to change the system.

He also said that, with House Democratic leaders and the Obama administration still trying to round up enough votes, there’s a chance the health care bill won’t pass the House. That would allow lawmakers to further revise a health care bill.

“If we defeat the Senate bill, that’s when I think we take a deep breath, try to look for common ground (and) find a way to put together a bill the people would support,” Edwards said. “I still hold out hope we can pass a bill that would unite the American people and not divide us.”

Opponents Weigh In

Edwards’ decision could take a potent campaign season issue off the table for his potential Republican general election opponents, Rob Curnock and Bill Flores, who are competing in a primary runoff election.

Both candidates oppose health care reform efforts. In statements Monday, both campaigns seemed to support Edwards’ stance but urged him to go further.

Flores’ release suggested Edwards use “every ounce of energy to encourage other Democrats to vote against this bill.”

Curnock’s statement called on the congressman to use his “access and influence” as a high-ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee “to make sure this bill does not pass.”

Edwards responded, “I intend to continue using my votes and voice to oppose the House and Senate health care bills.”

Edwards, who sits on the House Budget Committee, cast a procedural vote against the reconciliation bill Monday. The bill was passed out of committee by a 21-16 margin.

Leaders of the Waco Tea Party were planning Monday to deliver a thank-you card to Edwards today for coming out against the legislation. The card will include pleas for Edwards to vote certain ways on several anticipated procedural votes.

Leaders from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Texas Association of Business and the National Federation of Independent Business were moving ahead with a press conference at 10 a.m. today at the Waco Hilton to discuss what a statement calls “the devastating impact” of the legislation on employers.

Published on Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Monday, March 15, 2010

Texas Progressive Alliance Roundup - March 15, 2010


The Texas Progressive Alliance heads into March Madness with its own bracket of news and links for the week.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme wonders how Republicans can be so violently against having services they desperately need?

Off the Kuff analyzed county returns in the primaries for Governor, Lite Guv, and the Commissioners.

When are you "too gay" for your job? The Texas Cloverleaf finds out.

WhosPlayin broke the story of a Tea-Partying Lewisville City Councilman who has failed to pay his business property taxes for the 28 years he has been in business. On the same weekend, the story came out that the son of the Flower Mound mayor and her public school Bible class promoting husband was busted with marijuana, a BB gun, and stolen property in his car. (But don't worry, he wasn't actually arrested.)

Bay Area Houston says When Capitalism Works we buy from China.

WCNews at Eye On Williamson says it's Time for Democrats to go all in on health care.

This week, McBlogger brings you Tom Pauken, Moron (NSFW).

Karl Rove is "proud" that the Bush administration tortured suspected al-Qaeda terrorists. That -- coupled with the Obama administration's recalcitrance to prosecute Rove, Cheney, Bush, et.al for their admitted war crimes -- has PDiddie at Brains and Eggs a little more pessimistic than usual.

Attention all Breathers! It's URGENT that you attend the EPA Public Hearing on the proposed new ozone standards. The hearing is Tuesday in Arlington and to help get you motivated TXsharon posted a video on Bluedaze: DRILLING REFORM FOR TEXAS.

Neil at Texas Liberal says that with one-in-three folks in Houston lacking health insurance, Houston Mayor Annise Parker should be speaking up in favor in health care reform. Mayor Parker has already spoken up on the federal issues of the census and EPA air quality standards. So why not speak up on this federal issue that impacts Houston?

Lightseeker at TexasKaos tells us, again, why Rick Perry Must Go. It seems his cronies want the private sector bozos who messed up the validation procedure for Food Stamps, to advise on fixing the system, and they don't understand what all the fuss is about. I mean doesn't every vendor get a no-bid contract?

Video Lunch: Wars Sending U.S. Into Ruin



From the Real News Network:
Eric Margolis: Obama the peace president is fighting battles his country cannot afford.

Local News: Capital Improvements Continues in Bryan

Bryan Improvements Ongoing
By Cassie Smith

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

The city of Bryan is buzzing with more than $40 million worth of construction projects, and another $17 million of work is set to start this year.

Last week, the Bryan City Council, city staff members and candidates in the May municipal election took a bus tour of about 50 capital improvement projects and new developments around the city.

"The city of Bryan is working very diligently in getting capital projects designed and under construction," said Linda Huff, the city's public works director. "Hopefully, the citizens have noticed all the construction. Construction costs are at an all-time low, and therefore the city is getting a great value for planned improvements."

Huff said the projects are helping the community by providing jobs for construction workers.

The funding for some projects comes from grants and other agencies. The Safe Routes to School project, for example, which connects schools to a park and neighborhoods along Carter Creek Parkway, was funded by the Texas Department of Transportation.

The city has applied for additional Safe Routes funding for more sidewalk projects, but awards have not yet been designated.

The city is working on the annual update for its five-year capital improvements plan and seeking input from residents regarding projects and priorities.

City Engineer Paul Kaspar said residents can provide input by filling out a form at www.bryantx.gov/cip.

City officials are also willing to visit neighborhood associations to collect input, he said.

Big-Dollar Projects

The city has been investing in downtown renovations for the past few years and is currently in the third phase of the downtown redevelopment project. The $6.5 million worth of work is 10 percent complete and includes rebuilding parts of Main, Martin Luther King Jr., 23rd and 24th streets.

State funding is also being used to replace the two-lane Old Reliance Road overpass over Texas 6 with a five-lane bridge. The $6.5 million project will also include sidewalks.

And engineers are about halfway through the design process of a $4 million reconstruction project on College Main. Construction is planned to begin this summer from Old College Road to the city limits. Sidewalks and bike lanes will be added on both sides of the street, and water and sewer lines will also be updated. City officials said the improvements should increase the potential for retail development or increased housing density in the area.

The city is spending about $1.5 million to install 6-foot-wide sidewalks on Martin Luther King Jr. Street. That work is expected to be completed by the end of the year. The project will replace damaged sidewalks and extend them from Muckleroy Street to Texas 6 at the Old Reliance Road bridge. It will also include a pedestrian bridge on East Martin Luther King Jr. Street that will cross the tributary of Carters Creek adjacent to Sadie Thomas Park.

Development

The $200,000 design work for the Next Generation Industrial Park is 20 percent complete. The city will extend water and sewer services to the industrial park, which will be on more than 191 acres north of Texas 6 and F.M. 2818.

The park will include a 3,000-square-foot truck stop and a Denny's restaurant, and the city has secured a $1 million grant to extend a spur line off the Union Pacific Railroad.

Design work on renovations to the City Hall annex is 75 percent complete. The upgrades to the old police department building at the corner of 29th Street and Texas Avenue will be paid for with a $695,000 grant. The work is expected to be complete next March.

Developer Doug Pederson is nearing completion on improvements to several properties along South College Avenue.

The project includes upgrades to the old Bryan Arms apartments and properties surrounding the complex. The work includes exterior and interior renovations, window replacements and new driveways and sidewalks.

The city is also expecting a new 2,950-square-foot Wings-n-More to open on Jaguar Drive.

And the city received about $150,000 in parkland dedication and development fees from the opening of Z-Islander Waves Apartments, a 336-unit complex on 26 acres next to the newly opened Wolf Run Condos, a site that had been considered undevelopable.

The Highland Hills development will sit on more than 40 acres between Briarcrest Drive, Texas 6 and Boonville Road and combine retail, commercial and residential components. A new street is proposed within the development that would connect Wildflower Drive to the Texas 6 northbound frontage road.

A second public road is proposed to extend north from Briarcrest Drive and intersect with that road.It's still being worked out whether they will be city-funded or privately funded streets, Kaspar said.

Street Maintenance

Construction is expected to be finished by December on a $3.5 million project to rebuild Bryan Avenue and Beck Street.

The work includes replacing pavement on Bryan Avenue from 28th Street to Sims Avenue and on Beck Street from Sims Avenue to Anson Street. Six-foot sidewalks will be added to Bryan Avenue on both sides of the road, antique-style street lights will be installed and decorative paver inlays will be placed at the intersection of Bryan Avenue and 29th Street and at the Bryan Avenue-Sims Avenue-Beck Street interchange.

Design work on the $4.7 million West 28th Street reconstruction project is expected to be complete by October.

The project includes widening West 28th Street from Congress Street to Palasota Drive and adding sidewalks.

Officials are also close to finishing design work for a Parker Avenue project.

The city entered into an agreement with Union Pacific Railroad and the Texas Department of Transportation to finance the construction.

The project includes the addition of street lights and new sidewalks between Sims and Parker avenues.

Published on Sunday, March 14, 2010